On 1/22/2005 6:54 AM On a whim, mrpsychology pounded out on the keyboard
Why wouldn't you create a data partition and just share it between your
OS's? I have 5 OS's, a data drive, a programs drive, a mirrored data
drive, all between 3 hard drives. It is much more efficient than copying
back and forth. You can also reduce the size of your OS drives to about 5
gig each since all they have on them is the OS (basically). And I have
backup partitions on separate physical drives of the OS's and programs
drive. I had 2 of the three drives fail within a year and because I had
redundant backups between the drives, nothing was lost.
--
Terry
Well, i was dumb on the purchase of my hardrives and most were not
planned, so i dont have the same size on my satas 36 and 74. and my ide
250. I can use files on my x64 which is on my ide from my xp 32bit on my
sata, and it takes less than 5 minutes to copy 4.5days worth of iTunes
music to one place to the other. so, when it comes to reinstalling
windows if i have to i dont lose any data and dont have to have any
emulations of any sort. It is easy to boot either naturally and to have
the folders shared between the two. I have watched a movie on my 32bit os
using my x64 bits application absolutely fine, i dont need a virtual
machine when i am not prohibited. granted if i want to be logged on to
the x64 it is simple, 'restart' 'delete' go to 'boot priority' click ide
hit F10 and then it boots the ide as C, vice versa, but i am not closed to
operating or accessing any of them, so why would i need virtual machine?
Naturally, i was ging to get pearpc and emulate the mac os but decided
against it. One has to have a slow hardrive an old one to have long waits
on transfers between them. Jeeze it only takes a couple of minutes to
transfer a movie between the two. ***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.