C
Coder
I notice that MS says the version numbers have the following format:
<major version>.<minor version>.<build number>.<revision>
If you give a assembly version as "1.0.*", the two latest numbers should
increment.
However, the latest number (rightmost/revision) is the fastest moving, which
increments for every build. Shouldn't that be the Build no, not the
revision no ?
And when does the 3rd number (now called build number, but shouldn't it be
the revision no) increments ?
Anybody know anything ?
best regards
Terje
<major version>.<minor version>.<build number>.<revision>
If you give a assembly version as "1.0.*", the two latest numbers should
increment.
However, the latest number (rightmost/revision) is the fastest moving, which
increments for every build. Shouldn't that be the Build no, not the
revision no ?
And when does the 3rd number (now called build number, but shouldn't it be
the revision no) increments ?
Anybody know anything ?
best regards
Terje