Do you choose VS2002 or 2003?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vicent
  • Start date Start date
Vicent said:
Is it a need to upgrade VC 7.0 to VC 7.1? Thanks. Vicent
Click to expand...

No.

Stay away from VS02 -- it is a buggy piece of crap that would barely be called
a beta from a legitimate software co.
 
Julie said:
No.

Stay away from VS02 -- it is a buggy piece of crap that would barely be called
a beta from a legitimate software co.
Click to expand...

Julie, do not understand your response ... You say there is no need to
upgrade and then you say the 2002 is buggy.

Anyway, I had more exposure on 2003. Supposedly there is a significant
difference; VC++ 2003 has a visual form designer and 2002 did not.

As for buginess of 2003, we noticed a bug in watch window; sometimes it
interprets the values wrong and we need to inspect memory window to see
real values. And it does not like to inspect references.

Keep 2002 and get 2005 Beta 1. Upgrade next year.

Roman
 
roman said:
Julie, do not understand your response ... You say there is no need to
upgrade and then you say the 2002 is buggy.
Click to expand...

Perhaps I misunderstood -- I was think the OP was asking if they needed to
first have vs02 installed before they could install vs03...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

DLL dependencies 2
Can't get "typedef INTERNETAPI (*fp)()" to compiled with VC++ 7.0 (unmanaged) 1
Can't open VC++ 7.1 projects in 7.0 2
Converting Activex application 1
type_info link errors 1
Reference to temporary 4
VC++2003.NET to Visual Studio EXPRESS 2
Can MSVCR70.DLL/MSVCP70.DLL be used from VC++ 2003 1

Back
Top