Not if you want to get anything done in any semblance of real time.
256MB bare minimum, 512 best choice, despite what MS may say.
Val
--
Bringing you BeadWizard Design Software www.beadwizard.com
***************************
Practice safe eating -- always use condiments.
***************************
It's enough to "run" XP, but it will be quite slow, and you'll have a lot
of swapping out to the swapfile. I have two similar machines running xp,
one has 256mb of ram, the other 512. The difference is obvious
As a practical matter, no. You want at least 256 MB, preferably 512
MB. Memory's not that expensive; you may as wll upgrade to 1 GB all
at once rather than in increments, because it's only a matter of
time till 512 MB isn't enough.
Only just barely. It should not be the 'recommended'amount. 256 will
make a great difference; depending on workload you might need more. See
discussion on how big a page file at my page www.aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm and use the linked measuring tool on how
much page file is in actual use as a guide to how much would be worth
while
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
