did Excel GAMMADIST parameters change??

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsterkel
  • Start date Start date
T

tsterkel

In the literature, Milesky, Tucker, et.al. they use GAMMADIST with parameters
of (alpha,beta,x,cum). However my Excel has the parameters of
(x,alpha,beta,cum). Did GAMMADIST change? merely shifting "x" to the
implied new order does NOT provide the same results!
 
If you would provide a reference to the article, we miight be able to tell
you what the authors actually did.

Jerry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Using GAMMADIST in VBA 2
Using a two-dimensional array in Excel 2002 or 2003 4
Solver Ignores Constraints 1
Add incremental character to cell value at change in value 449becomes 449-A 510 becomes 510-B 2
How to determine cursor location? 4
Insert row at change macro - how to change it. 1
CSV treatment difference: Office 2001 vs Office X 1
Network Revived but File-Sharing Confused 5

Back
Top