desktop video player capable of "stereo image"

  • Thread starter Thread starter malnitz
  • Start date Start date
M

malnitz

Hi,

I need a desktop video player which is capable of showing the same
movie/video in two neighbouring windows at the same time - and with
exactly the same timing in the pictures.

I have tried to launch the same player twice and run the same video in
each player, but it is impossible to ensure exactly the same timing of
the moving images.

Can anybody recommend a suitable player?

Would it be possible to generate the desired stereo movie by using a
videoeditting programme ?

Thank you in advance, Malnitz

PS: I need it for some eye training
 
I need a desktop video player which is capable of showing the same
movie/video in two neighbouring windows at the same time - and with
exactly the same timing in the pictures.

I have tried to launch the same player twice and run the same video in
each player, but it is impossible to ensure exactly the same timing of
the moving images.

Can anybody recommend a suitable player?

Would it be possible to generate the desired stereo movie by using a
videoeditting programme ?

Thank you in advance, Malnitz

PS: I need it for some eye training
Click to expand...

Using the same picture in each window will NOT give you stereo. The 2
images have to be different - one as seen by the left eye, the other
as seen by the right eye. Your eyes don't see the same image.
 
Al Klein said:
On 17 Feb 2006 05:07:05 -0800, (e-mail address removed) wrote:
Click to expand...
Using the same picture in each window will NOT give you stereo. The 2
images have to be different - one as seen by the left eye, the other
as seen by the right eye. Your eyes don't see the same image.
Click to expand...

Interestingly, a it has been discovered that two identical videos running
side by side, but separated slightly by the number of frames (i.e. slightly
out-of-sync) can produce a "pseudo" 3D effect. It's best observed when the
subject in the frame is moving.

M
 
Interestingly, a it has been discovered that two identical videos running
side by side, but separated slightly by the number of frames (i.e. slightly
out-of-sync) can produce a "pseudo" 3D effect. It's best observed when the
subject in the frame is moving.
Click to expand...

Think about it. The subject is moving. The eyes see different
images. I think Proxmire is stirring.
 
Al Klein said:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:46 GMT, "Michael Laplante"

Think about it. The subject is moving. The eyes see different
images. I think Proxmire is stirring.
Click to expand...

Proxmire? What is? I'm off to Google. . .

M
 
Colour me confused. . . What has this to do with the post?
Click to expand...

He objected to effort spent to "find" the obvious. It hasn't occurred
to you yet that a moving image is inherently pseudo-3d? And that this
is as obvious as the "finding" that the cause of poverty is lack of
money (which cost the government untold millions to find out, which is
what Proxmire was objecting to).
 
Al Klein said:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:49:29 GMT, "Michael Laplante"


He objected to effort spent to "find" the obvious. It hasn't occurred
to you yet that a moving image is inherently pseudo-3d? And that this
is as obvious as the "finding" that the cause of poverty is lack of
money (which cost the government untold millions to find out, which is
what Proxmire was objecting to).
Click to expand...

Um, okay. (Slowly backs aways. . .)

M
 
Back
Top