design and develop extensible.NET web application framework -hypothetical question

[Hazz]

If in an interview next week I was told to Design and Develop Extensible Web
Application Frameworks using Microsoft .NET technologies.

How do I break that question down?

My first temptation would be, "Isn't the existing .NET framework
sufficient?"
My first suspicion that I don't have the experience is that I don't know the
difference between a handlers and a module.
My first attempt to salvage my ego (and watch them cringe silently) would be
to say something like, "I can derive to my hearts content from existing .NET
classes and interfaces." I mean isn't that extensibility?
My clever attempt to hide my slightly less than top tier offering might be
"What are your company's four main use-case scenarios that I would decompose
into objects, accessible through interfaces, to supplement what .NET already
offers.?"

Doesn't Framework mean some prettty serious stuff? Like a whole new
enhancement to something that is already a bit complicated? (Do I have to
tweak http.sys or dream about ISAPI at night?)

With .NET 2.0 asp.net 2.0, c# 2.0, visual studio 2005 coming out in a pretty
complete form by summer, how can I avoid having to say something like, "I
have good general .NET experience and have MCAD certification in VS .NET "
but hang on for a few months while I figure out how I would develop this
..NET extensible Framework you would like based on what I find out about
VS05, Indigo, Windows Activation Service, etc? -----------hazz

 

[Cor Ligthert]

Hazz,

I am not a native speaking English person however lets brake the question
down.

What can this sentence beneath means in some simpler words.
"Design and Develop Extensible Web Application Frameworks using Microsoft
..NET technologies"

Create an extensible web solution using Microsoft .Net technologies.

Reading the last sentence you create your classes using Microsoft .Net
technologies.
And because of that you are using OOP, what is than difficult on that.
Is that not just basic stuff?

Just how I am reading the question.

Cor

 

[Hazz]

Thank you Cor. I agree with you that it could be as simple as that.
Thank you for keeping it simple which is probably just the way it was
intended.
-hazz