M
Markus Eßmayr
Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team,
please please add some progress information to the tool.
Thanks very much!
Max
please please add some progress information to the tool.
Thanks very much!
Max
Markus Eßmayr said:Hello to the defragmentation-tool-developer-team,
please please add some progress information to the tool.
Thanks very much!
Richard Urban said:Most people have better things to do with their time than sit and watch
little boxes or bars being shifted around.
The Vista defragmenter is a background service that does what must be
done - when your computer is idle. It needs no interaction from you and is
sufficient for the task.
Richard Urban said:Most people have better things to do with their time than sit and watch little
boxes or bars being shifted around.
The Vista defragmenter is a background service that does what must be done - when
your computer is idle. It needs no interaction from you and is sufficient for the
task.
I'm with you, Mark. Have been using Diskeeper for several years, now, on
several units - it's efficient and reliable, and I love being able to
customize when it does its thing and how often. I have it defragging my
tower's drives and my USB drive as well, in the wee small hours when I'm
asleep.
Do you know 100% that the MS version of Defrag works better than a 3rd.
party app?
If someone wants to set and watch defrag work the that's their business. I
personally use
PerfectDisk2008 and is superior to the MS version. I ran the MS version
first then ran PerfectDisk2008 and was very surprised how much more
PerfectDisk2008 found that needed more defragging. Yes I'm very aware they
all do things differently, but IMO the MS version lacks a lot.
In message <[email protected]> "SG"
No. Do you know 100% that other versions work better, and if so, does
it save enough time to justify it's cost?
The "do things differently" can be important, there are several
different concepts that get lumped into "defragmentation" (or more
rightly, optimization)
Different tools can be built on different optimization theories and
algorithms with regards to optimization, and will report other tools'
optimized results as being less then optimal. No one method or
algorithm is ideal for all users, all usage patterns, all of the time.
This doesn't mean that it's impossible or even difficult to compare
tools or results, but rather, that you cannot look at what one tool's
analysis reports to evaluate another defragmentation tool.
Since the defragmenter in my Vista system runs in the background and I havef/fgeorge said:Try www.auslogic.com it has a VERY good defragmenter and it is free.
It works on Win2k, XP and Vista, so should cover all your pc's.
Significantly faster than Vistas built in one.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.