Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

V

Vortex Soft

http://www.junglecreatures.com/

Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.




Notes:

VB, C# are CLS compliant
You can also use managed code with C++


Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.


Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.


I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
nothing else but studying or playing.
 
C

Cor Ligthert

Nick,

And I thought that is something for Nick, "It needs a thief to catch a
thief", with what I do not mean you of course. This is in the text.

New License Keys Issued
The latest version of Decompiler.NET requires that you install an updated
license file. You should have received an updated license file via email.
Please replace your existing license file with this new one after installing
the latest release.

Cor
 
N

Nak

LOL! Not quite sure what to say, maybe I expressed my opinions with my
other post :p

Nick.
 
B

Brian Henry

if VB.NET was good for nothing but studying and playing hows come some major
corporations run applications they created in VB.NET? Because of the way IL
is compiled symbols are going to be included... this happens with any IL
language such as Java. and what is stoping you from reverse engineering C++
code? if you can understand assembly and have some time on your hands you
can decompile it also in a sense
 
O

One Handed Man \( OHM - Terry Burns \)

You really dont know what you are talking about do you !



--

OHM ( Terry Burns )
. . . One-Handed-Man . . .
If U Need My Email ,Ask Me

Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
 
C

CJ Taylor

You know... RSA encryption can be cracked too... but most times, it's just
not worth the hassle...
 
O

One Handed Man \( OHM - Terry Burns \)

Virtually anything can be cracked, security management is all about managing
to an 'acceptable' risk for the environment in which the protected entity
exists.

--

OHM ( Terry Burns )
. . . One-Handed-Man . . .
If U Need My Email ,Ask Me

Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
 
C

CJ Taylor

My point exactly.

=0

One Handed Man ( OHM - Terry Burns ) said:
Virtually anything can be cracked, security management is all about managing
to an 'acceptable' risk for the environment in which the protected entity
exists.

--

OHM ( Terry Burns )
. . . One-Handed-Man . . .
If U Need My Email ,Ask Me

Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
Click to expand...
 
S

Steve McLellan

Probably - if you had an algorithm to do it fast, I'm sure you could get a
job in some fairly specialist places :)

Steve
 
I

Imran Koradia

Remember - all depends on the key length chosen. If you're going to choose a
16-bit key - hell I can crack that too :) (Yes- within my lifetime ;-)) !!
Read here: http://news.com.com/2100-1023-204556.html?legacy=cnet

Ofcourse, the standard now is to use 512 bit keys and sooner or later we'll
be moving to a 1024 bit standard as soon as as someone (or rather group)
cracks a 512-bit RSA key encoded message. Thats a totally different ball
game altogether.

Imran.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Compiler Failed with Error Code 2000 2
Don't Lock Type Objects! 0
FWT Newsletter - Weekly - March 22, 2004 3
AMD R600 Architecture and GPU Analysis (long read) 5
FWT Newsletter - Weekly - March 8, 2004 4
FWT Newsletter - Weekly - August 23, 2004 6
FWT Newsletter - Weekly - October 4, 2004 2
FWT Newsletter - Weekly - August 16, 2004 1

Top