L
LauraB
We have an Access 2000 file format database and are currently using Access
2007, and I am wondering if we should convert our database to the new Access
2007 format? Or I suppose the 2003 format?
As far as I can tell, I don't need any of the 2007-file-format-only features
(looked at list in help documentation). And aside from maybe wanting to add
user-level security one day I don't think we have a solid reason to stay in
an old format; the two computers that access the database are both using
Access 2007.
Part of me says "if it's not broke..." and to just leave things as is. But
I wonder if the new format, or 2003, would be better for general stabilty,
performance, or data integrity or some other important but not super obvious
reason.
Thoughts?
2007, and I am wondering if we should convert our database to the new Access
2007 format? Or I suppose the 2003 format?
As far as I can tell, I don't need any of the 2007-file-format-only features
(looked at list in help documentation). And aside from maybe wanting to add
user-level security one day I don't think we have a solid reason to stay in
an old format; the two computers that access the database are both using
Access 2007.
Part of me says "if it's not broke..." and to just leave things as is. But
I wonder if the new format, or 2003, would be better for general stabilty,
performance, or data integrity or some other important but not super obvious
reason.
Thoughts?