Constants or resources

[DBC User]

Hi Sharpies,

Quick question apart from deployment and internationalisation benefits,
is there any benefit in using string table for resources than
constants? Which is very good in performance, resources or constants?

Thanks in advance.

 

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

I think that the resousrce have more over head than a direct string
declared in the code.

 

[DBC User]

Is there a way to elobarate the overheads, trying to understand. One
thing for sure is there is method call to get the string values at run
time on the other hand constands are replaced at run time. Is this
correct?
Thanks.

 

[Ignacio Machin \( .NET/ C# MVP \)]

Hi,

Is there a way to elobarate the overheads, trying to understand. One
thing for sure is there is method call to get the string values at run
time on the other hand constands are replaced at run time. Is this
correct?

Yes, I assume this is the case.

How different it's ?, well you will have to find that out