complex problem, or not?

[Guest]

hello all!
i've written about this before, but it was in another thread with another
topic, i'd like to re-state it more as a question than just a comment as i
did before.

here is my "data design" so to say....

original data, many fields and values
1st set of changed data:
will be an exact copy of original, except
user can change any value of any field, old value always saved
2nd set of changed data based on 1st set, changes operate the same as 1st
3rd set of changed data, based on original, changes operate the same as 1st

okay? hard to explain.
so, i don't want to store all the data again and again, that makes no sense.
the user may change one record, one value on that on record, and leave the
other 50 unchanged.
so, what about having a table of original data, then one table that contains
basic information of "new" sets, such as name of iteration and a key, then a
table that contains a link to the original record, a link to the interation
information, and the changed value(s)?

does this make sense or seem logical? is there a better way?

tblOrigData
pk
value1
value2
value3
value4

tblIterations (there would be a record for the original data also)
pk
name
date
fkKey (link to the iteration this is based from, equal to pk for original
data)

tblChanges (one record for each value changed)
pk
fkIterations (link to interation this belongs to)
fkOrigData (link to which value changed)
value

thanks!!

 

[Larry Daugherty]

A more reasonable question for your subject line might be "Is this a
problem or not"? My answer would be "It's not".

These Access newsgroups are for posting and resolving real issues
people are facing in trying to solve real problems and provide real
solutions.

Your post seems more appropriate to a bs session.

Audit visibility is usually to a record; if and when you choose to
implement it. Allen Browne has something relevant on his site.

HTH

 

[Guest]

excuse me for not having something you perceive as a "real issue", until this
time, i me friendly and helpful people in these groups.