COM under .NET

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bryan Gan
  • Start date Start date
B

Bryan Gan

Dear all,

Can I know is there any improvement if develop COM
under .NET comparing to develop COM using VC6?

thanks.
 
When you develop COM with .NET, you are creating an additional layer, which
is rather dumb. If you have to stay in the COM world, do not use .NET. Now,
..NET allows you to interop with COM for apps you are updating, which is not
a bad thing. .NET and COM are not the same thing; they are quite different
systems.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
Author: ADO.NET and XML: ASP.NET on the Edge

****************************************************************************
****
Think Outside the Box!
****************************************************************************
****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

COM issue under .NET 6
MSMQ, COM and 32/64 bit compatibility 1
.NET COM threading model 2
How to get Isolated COM Activation (Registration-Free COM using a .manifest file) to work on Windows 1
Consuming COM-Objects built as .NET assembly 2
Web Service / Authenticating Proxy .NET and COM interop 9
Managed to unmanaged performance 1
DCOM from .Net 1

Back
Top