<snip>
W> "Verdict. Canon have some stiff competition from Epson with their
W> similarly specified 4870, but Canon is ahead by a whisker with their
W> 9950F"
W> Personally I couldn't see that much differece but here in Europe the
W> Canon is considerably cheaper than the Epson. That was the main reason
W> for me to buy the Canon.
Here in Norway, the price difference isn't that much, 3800 NOK (465
EUR) vs. 4300 NOK (525 EUR), so I ended up with the Epson 4990, as I
assumed it would be easier to get the software to work without much trouble.
So far both Epson Scan and Silverfast seems to work well on my old 266
MHz PII ....
W> ... which was no surprise to me either. Yet, I have to say that I've
W> got many 35mm photographs that, when scanned with the Minolta, look
W> worse than the Canon sample in the comparison (probably hand-motion
W> blur), but still look sharp when printed on A3 paper. In many cases
W> the sharpness of the photograph itself is the bottle-neck, unless you
W> use a tripod for everything. I haven't tried printing MF scans from
W> the Canon yet, but my expectations are high, considering the 2.7x
W> increase in the size of the original compared to 35mm.
I bought this scanner mainly for digging into an old negative archive,
mainly medium format film from my parents, and for that purpose, it is
certainly adequate. As you say, the sharpness of the photograph is
often the limiting factor, it may be old grainy film emulsions,
motion blur or improper focusing. B&W emulsions are certainly a lot
better these days than they were 40 years ago, on the other hand, old
Kodacolor and Ektachrome scans surprisingly well. At the moment I'm
batch scanning mostly with Epson scan, 2400 ppi, with medium grain
reduction and unsharp mask on low. If I find any gems, I'll go back
and try to squeeze some more out of those pictures.
If and when I come to archiving my own 35mm slide archive with 15000+
slides, it will be with a dedicated film scanner. I won't even try to
scan that many slides without a slide feeder, but I'll probably try
the 4990 a little bit for 35mm anyway, as it seems to give acceptable
results up to A4.
<snip>