M
mbayaq
My question is as follows: Is it possible to access a remote Windows
share from a Win98 or MS-DOS 6.22 client using an alias which is NOT
the target host's actual hostname? I've added an entry to the local
LMHOSTS file which does get me to the point of opening a socket and
attempting communication. However, I then get a "called name not
present" from the server.
Does anyone have ideas or suggestions? Is there some special way I can
construct the "net use" command to get around this? Or perhaps a
server setting (Windows 2003) which will tell it to respond to the
alias I've created?
Here is a very brief network capture from Ethereal:
--
No. Time Source Destination
Protocol Info
12 5.746180 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=1450 Len=0 MSS=1450
13 5.746211 192.168.65.1 192.168.65.101 TCP
netbios-ssn > 38700 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=17640 Len=0 MSS=1260
14 5.750980 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=1450 Len=0
16 5.753518 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 NBSS
Session request, to R51-VMNET<20> from INSTALL-10161<00>
17 5.753576 192.168.65.1 192.168.65.101 NBSS
Negative session response, Called name not present
18 5.755810 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=73 Ack=7 Win=1445 Len=0
--
I've weeded out domain browser announcements, etc., and have shown only
the connection and session setup attempt from the Win98 box. It does
not need nameservice, as its local LMHOSTS file has the IP. So, it
opens a socket and requests a session, but the server returns a
negative response because "Called name not present".
And spoofing it in WINS did not fix it either. Any other ideas?
Thanks for you help.
share from a Win98 or MS-DOS 6.22 client using an alias which is NOT
the target host's actual hostname? I've added an entry to the local
LMHOSTS file which does get me to the point of opening a socket and
attempting communication. However, I then get a "called name not
present" from the server.
Does anyone have ideas or suggestions? Is there some special way I can
construct the "net use" command to get around this? Or perhaps a
server setting (Windows 2003) which will tell it to respond to the
alias I've created?
Here is a very brief network capture from Ethereal:
--
No. Time Source Destination
Protocol Info
12 5.746180 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=1450 Len=0 MSS=1450
13 5.746211 192.168.65.1 192.168.65.101 TCP
netbios-ssn > 38700 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=17640 Len=0 MSS=1260
14 5.750980 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=1450 Len=0
16 5.753518 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 NBSS
Session request, to R51-VMNET<20> from INSTALL-10161<00>
17 5.753576 192.168.65.1 192.168.65.101 NBSS
Negative session response, Called name not present
18 5.755810 192.168.65.101 192.168.65.1 TCP
38700 > netbios-ssn [ACK] Seq=73 Ack=7 Win=1445 Len=0
--
I've weeded out domain browser announcements, etc., and have shown only
the connection and session setup attempt from the Win98 box. It does
not need nameservice, as its local LMHOSTS file has the IP. So, it
opens a socket and requests a session, but the server returns a
negative response because "Called name not present".
And spoofing it in WINS did not fix it either. Any other ideas?
Thanks for you help.