Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)

T

this.tech.guy

Some say that it was all a hoax to increase awareness to Office Update

Anybody heard of Nick DeBaggis before?

And what if they're trying to feed us some weird medicated code? In
the fear of propagation, would we be softer?

this.tech.guy
 
C

Colon Terminus

Some say that it was all a hoax to increase awareness to Office Update

Anybody heard of Nick DeBaggis before?

And what if they're trying to feed us some weird medicated code? In
the fear of propagation, would we be softer?

this.tech.guy
Click to expand...

Well it increased my awareness plenty.
I became so aware that I dumped IE altogether.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987) 2
JPEG vulnerability 2
freeware to check third party software for the JPEG/gdi+ security flaw 2
Microsoft Security Bulletins for 12/14/04 1
Microsoft Security Bulletins for September 2004 1

Top