I am sure I read somewhere that its better to have your own firewall and I notice I already have the one on my computer turned on as well. Is it safer having your own and would the one on XP be enough and as good as the norton firewall. I did test and it was 299 downstream and 240 upstream so its very slow as it was at 459 when I disabled my firewall. Anymore suggestion are welcome, thank you.
With the current load of worm related traffic clogging the internet, your
software firewall could well be dragging down performance when it has to analyse
and / or log each worm probe hitting your network card.
As others have said, do not surf the internet without a firewall. We would not
want you driving your car with your brakes removed (to cut down on drag and
improve performance), and we sure don't want you surfing the internet without
firewall protection.
Connecting your computer to the internet with a router is an affordable,
effective, and responsible, solution.
Your computer will be safer. The router will block any malevolent internet
traffic. This further protects the internet, from your becoming infected and
spreading the infection.
Your computer will run better, with the router blocking the trash infection
traffic. Even if you run a software firewall also, the firewall will have much
less to do with the trash infection traffic blocked by the router.
If you can afford to have a computer, and broadband, you can afford a router.
For many reasons.
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.