Kevin said:
Everything else snipped for brevity -----------
I'm not sure what you are talking about.
You took what I said a bit too literally ;-)
If Automatic Updates is disabled,
you won't receive the Automatic Updates . . . basically.
OK, understood. I found other info that confirms
this. My concern was that *IF* MS REALLY wants
to propogate SP2, that having A.U. disabled would
NOT be enough, and the miserable thing would show
up unannounced and unwanted *anyway*. I have a perfectly
running SP1A system, fully protected upstream with firewall
& proxy and do not need or want any of SP2's supposed
"fixes". I gotta business to run here, and do NOT have the
time to spend turning off all the security crap that is enabled
by default and/or fixing other introduced instabilities.
What is
significant about the 13th?
It's the day after the 12th, when push comes
to shove, as it were.
What is meant by the term "virus" with
My attempt at humor:
It breaks things in some cases, just like a virus.
It comes to you disguised as something useful, just like a virus.
You don't *need* it, just like a virus.
AOL and Real Player are virii as well, by the same definition.