W
Wisgary
I'm doing some benchmarking tests to compare Microsoft's CLR against
Mono's CLR. I could use some suggestions for how to objectively
compare the code. To my surprise the few tests I've run so far have
had Mono running quite a bit faster than Vanilla .NET on my Windows XP
installation, which has me wondering if I'm doing something that's
sandbagging .NET. It's all console code, for Microsoft I'm just
running the .exe file from the command line, and for Mono I'm using
the mono command line to run the same .exe. The .exe file was
generated by Visual Studio 2005 on release mode. Is there anything
further left to do to optimize the running of the exe file under .NET?
Thanks for the help.
Mono's CLR. I could use some suggestions for how to objectively
compare the code. To my surprise the few tests I've run so far have
had Mono running quite a bit faster than Vanilla .NET on my Windows XP
installation, which has me wondering if I'm doing something that's
sandbagging .NET. It's all console code, for Microsoft I'm just
running the .exe file from the command line, and for Mono I'm using
the mono command line to run the same .exe. The .exe file was
generated by Visual Studio 2005 on release mode. Is there anything
further left to do to optimize the running of the exe file under .NET?
Thanks for the help.