AutoPatcher

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mark \(MCP\)
  • Start date Start date
M

Mark \(MCP\)

It seems whenever some company or someone comes up with a great method of
doing things for Windows, Microsoft has to ruin it. I liked AutoPatcher for
updating Windows XP computers, especially when it has saved time and allows
for updating XP computers that have slower connections.

See:
http://www.autopatcher.com/134
 
Mark (MCP) said:
It seems whenever some company or someone comes up with a great method of
doing things for Windows, Microsoft has to ruin it. I liked AutoPatcher
for updating Windows XP computers, especially when it has saved time and
allows for updating XP computers that have slower connections.

See:
http://www.autopatcher.com/134
I've never used AutoPatcher - I've never heard of it before - but it does
seem that Microsoft's objection was based on copyright. If that's the case,
then what's the problem? We do believe in copyright don't we?
 
What is so great about AutoPatcher? Does it block updating illegal Windows
installations? Will it protect all of Microsoft's assets? What about
Microsoft's copyrights? XP can be updated with slower connections. You mean
dial-up?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top