B
Björn Andersen
Hello Group,
We want to use ADAM to store our webaccess-data and need to extend/modify
the schema for that. Creating Attributes and classes donen't seem to
difficult. But we got several n-to-n relationships in the old
relational-DB-based model, e.g. we define rights-characteristics in one
table and user groups in an other. To move to Adam's X.500 object-orientated
Model we'd define a class for the rightsgroup and a class for the rights -
both can't be simple Attributes with a syntax. But one can't declare one
attribute of the group as the rights-class we'd need because the
attribute-syntax can't be modified.
I think we need attributes in a class of type/syntax: other self-defined
class.
How do we get around this problem ?
Or am I generally aproaching the problem from the wrong Side?
We want to use ADAM to store our webaccess-data and need to extend/modify
the schema for that. Creating Attributes and classes donen't seem to
difficult. But we got several n-to-n relationships in the old
relational-DB-based model, e.g. we define rights-characteristics in one
table and user groups in an other. To move to Adam's X.500 object-orientated
Model we'd define a class for the rightsgroup and a class for the rights -
both can't be simple Attributes with a syntax. But one can't declare one
attribute of the group as the rights-class we'd need because the
attribute-syntax can't be modified.
I think we need attributes in a class of type/syntax: other self-defined
class.
How do we get around this problem ?
Or am I generally aproaching the problem from the wrong Side?