AJR added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...
Anthony states "...instead of using the Secure Zone (hidden
partition Acronis creates on your hard drive) as the source
from which to recover....". In numerous posts about Acronis
the "Secure Zone" gets little or no mention. As a refresher,
the secure zone is a "safe" partition on the HD and the MBR is
modified to present "Hit F11 to restore...." at boot - much
like the restore system set up by OEMs.
Acronis also provides for backup to an external, or separate
internal, location - and both processes, Secure Zone and
external backup can be scheduled jointly as well as
incremental or differential backups.
regarding HEMI-Powered's post - current "beta" testing of
several applications has resulted in the need for often during
a system restore.
I assume you're referring to my "I don't beta test with my Visa
card" stance. If yes, I am curious as to why you DO? Are
certain/all upgrades/updates super important to you for REAL
reasons, e.g., you have an actual bug or failure or there is a
feature or feature set in the newer mousetrap? Those are the ONLY
two reasons I will be an early adopter of anything from any
company.
And, if my "beta" testing were literally destroying my entire
system, I would sure as hell rethink what I'm doing and perhaps
either stop upgrading/updating and/or find new developers. But,
that's just my opinion, YMMV.
Now, what I have to do more often than I like is to roll back my
system to a prior RP. Since I ALWAYS set my own RP before I even
let my malware protection update the system, I have been very
succesful. MS and app updates should be obvious, but why do I
care about malware? Because Symantec, eTrust, and Zone Alarm mix
in changes to their basic operation engine and to their
detections engines along with simple signature updates. It is
changes to software, some of which is system-critical, that is
the danger of a melt-down. MS usually, but not always, sets an RP
but the other guys I mention do not. Spybot is also one that
always sets its own.
I went to True Image some time back for a couple of reasons: the
last time I needed to have my system rebuilt by my
nephew/friend/PC builder, it was a long, ardurous journey, and
the other was that I had a suspicion that I was being hacked, and
wanted to step up my malware/spyware detection capability, put a
strong SW firewall in place, AND image C:\ to restore to a known
stable system in case a hack/malware attack took place. And,
naturally, to avoid having to spend a couple of weeks getting
things back the way I want them.
And, although I mentioned this before, it bears repeating: I have
NO data I created stored on C:\. Yes, some apps like Turbo Tax
insist on using My Computer, but for them, I back up the files to
another partition. I have extended data-only partitions to
prevent catastrophic loss of MY data in the event I need a true
nuke and reinstall of Windows.