B
BYoung via AccessMonster.com
I have a tab control that contains 7 tabs, each with a different subform-
Employee Info
Personal Info
Training
Testing
HR Records
Uniforms
Performance
I also have a couple switchboards set up, the first lets the user enter the
managment view or the admin view. in the management view the manager can
click the Employee Views button to view the tab control in read only mode.
Here is the code for opening this form in public(read only) view
Private Sub cmdpubempview_Click()
'command to access employee views in public(read only) mode
DoCmd.OpenForm "frmEmployeeView", acNormal, , , acFormReadOnly
End Sub
The problem I'm having is that 6 of the 7 tabs show their subforms yet for
some reason the uniform tab doesn't show the uniform subform. Also I have a
quicksearch combo box that in acNormal view will allow you to select whose
records to view, however, in read only mode this box is not active.
Any Ideas how to avoid this. Should I create a separate form specifically
for public viewing and lock all the fields? I would think there would be a
better way to deal with this problem.
Employee Info
Personal Info
Training
Testing
HR Records
Uniforms
Performance
I also have a couple switchboards set up, the first lets the user enter the
managment view or the admin view. in the management view the manager can
click the Employee Views button to view the tab control in read only mode.
Here is the code for opening this form in public(read only) view
Private Sub cmdpubempview_Click()
'command to access employee views in public(read only) mode
DoCmd.OpenForm "frmEmployeeView", acNormal, , , acFormReadOnly
End Sub
The problem I'm having is that 6 of the 7 tabs show their subforms yet for
some reason the uniform tab doesn't show the uniform subform. Also I have a
quicksearch combo box that in acNormal view will allow you to select whose
records to view, however, in read only mode this box is not active.
Any Ideas how to avoid this. Should I create a separate form specifically
for public viewing and lock all the fields? I would think there would be a
better way to deal with this problem.