A
Alessandro Kiramarios
I have a problem with Acc2003 which I did not have with Acc2000.
In Acc2000 you could filter form and the resultant recordset would have been
stored.
For example, if I had a form with all my suppliers from around the word and
have a button on it that had the following code: debug.print
me.form.recordset.recordcount, the result after clicking the button in the
immediate window would be: 536.
If I filtered the records (right click, "filter by selection") to only the
US suppliers and then click the button, in the immediate window the result
would be 356.
If I do the same with Acc2003, the result is always 536.
What is important to me is not the recordcount, is the resultant recordset
after the filtering and sorting.
In Acc2000 you could filter form and the resultant recordset would have been
stored.
For example, if I had a form with all my suppliers from around the word and
have a button on it that had the following code: debug.print
me.form.recordset.recordcount, the result after clicking the button in the
immediate window would be: 536.
If I filtered the records (right click, "filter by selection") to only the
US suppliers and then click the button, in the immediate window the result
would be 356.
If I do the same with Acc2003, the result is always 536.
What is important to me is not the recordcount, is the resultant recordset
after the filtering and sorting.