In
pjgalloway said:
Is there a reason (performance?) for using the Call statement as
opposed to just writing the sub's name?
No technical or performance reason I'm aware of. As far as I know, it's
just a matter of personal preference. Some people like to use the Call
statement to make it clear that a subroutine is being called. I prefer
to write subroutines with meaningful names that state what they're
supposed to do, and just write the name alone. If I have to call some
procedure without a descriptive name -- for example, if I have to call
an event procedure -- then I use the Call statement.
Since I work in a one-programmer shop, that style works well for me.
Companies that have multiple software developers working on the same
project might find otherwise -- or not -- and ought to establish a style
guideline that enforces some consistency.