The table has about 75 fields . . . . .the form is a copy of a paper form
that we have to fill out, it is a government form. Well after much work and
looking at the form I noticed something . . . . . . I had all the fields
named WRONG . . . . .once I fixed that there was no issue!!! I was doing a
lot of coping and pasting . . . . that will teach me!!!
That's one (only one of many!) of the problems that often stem from
letting paper forms drive table design.
Paper forms have their own set of logic (government forms may not even
have that... :-{( ). The underlying information structure which makes
sense for a paper form is VERY DIFFERENT from the logic of normalized
tables; if you base your table structure on a paper form it's almost
certainly going to be non-normalized, and get you into a lot of
trouble!
Consider treating your required government printout - not as a Form,
not as a Table - but as a Report, the final output of a system. Like
most Reports, it would NOT be based directly on a table, nor would
there necessarily be a Form that looks like it; instead, your table
structures would be based on the logical relationships between the
real-life entities which go into the report, and the Report (the
"Form" in government-speak) would be based on a Query consolidating
data across multiple tables.
John W. Vinson[MVP]