2003 SBS vs 2003 Standard Server

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe
  • Start date Start date
J

Joe

Not sure if this is the correct place, but I will ask
anyway.

I am looking to place a file server in my company that
will serve both mac OS9, Windows 9x and XP clients. I
have recently received a quote of $700+ for an OEM
verision of Standard Server 2003, and a quote of about
$500 for SBS server, both with my hardware purchase.
Though SBS has many other things I will probably never
use, it is less expensive than the stand alone version of
2003 Server that I need is included.

If I go with SBS, will I be able to install only the
Server OS alone? Or does this install as one big package
that cannot be broken down?

Thank You,

Joe
 
Not sure if this is the correct place, but I will ask
anyway.

I am looking to place a file server in my company that
will serve both mac OS9, Windows 9x and XP clients. I
have recently received a quote of $700+ for an OEM
verision of Standard Server 2003, and a quote of about
$500 for SBS server, both with my hardware purchase.
Though SBS has many other things I will probably never
use, it is less expensive than the stand alone version of
2003 Server that I need is included.

If I go with SBS, will I be able to install only the
Server OS alone? Or does this install as one big package
that cannot be broken down?

Joe:

Try this NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
 
Back
Top