Xref

T

Tramp

"Xref is tool to search files for cross-references to each other. The
program allows you to exclude groups of files (graph,audio etc) and
user defined groups. At the end of the search, Xref will build a
report file"
ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win95/txtutl/xref10.zip
 
B

Boomer

what are u doing man? Dont flood the NG with your posts. These are
too many to handle.
Sanjay

?
If you can't handle a lot of freeware then you shouldn't be here.
Tramp provides this group with great freeware.
 
S

Sami Sihvonen

Sanjay Goel said:
what are u doing man? Dont flood the NG with your posts. These are too many
to handle.

Actually I would like to thank Trap, looks like he posted URL's for many
good freeware utilities. I have stored them in a text file and going to
check them out, couple of them looked very good. I would like to hear
more people posting about their own personal favorites?
 
L

Lance M Hillier, Sr

Paiva, paiva,
gukosomenaii, suomaleinen boyka!!!
(Pls excuse any errors).... Sisu!!
fka: Sakkinen
Thanks for post...
 
J

John Fitzsimons

IMHO,
I think Tramp offers a pretty good service,

An excellent one. :)

< snip >

Sanjay on the other hand probably shouldn't be allowed near newsgroups
if he doesn't know how to killfile posters and/or ignore posts !
 
3

3c273

I would think that if Tramp was going to go to all that work, why not cut
and paste it into one post? It did seem a bit much IMHO.
Louis
 
V

Vic Dura

what are u doing man? Dont flood the NG with your posts. These are too many
to handle.
Sanjay

Tramp's posts are among the best, most informative and most useful
posts to this NG.
 
M

msd13

Tramp's posts are among the best, most informative and most useful
posts to this NG.

It is about freeware which is the purpose of this NG. Posting to a
single thread is an idea, or linking to a page. I don't know how I'd
go about it, program titles arn't much good without descriptions...

It's good I think, if everybody only recommeded the programs they've
used and like most then a whole lot of stuff will be ignored, so it's
good that Tramp goes about things in his/her (sorry!) way, if anyone
doesn't like it they can just filter.

And yes that is just my opinion, deal with it !
 
S

Sanjay Goel

3c273 said:
I would think that if Tramp was going to go to all that work, why not
cut and paste it into one post? It did seem a bit much IMHO.
Louis

That's what I expected. having all of them in 1-2 posts would have been fine
with me. I certainly agree that all the posts were relevant to the NG but
having so many in so few time gives slight trouble following other post
threads.
And john, not everyone is an expert. I use OE for read NGs and I dont know
if it provides any features for killfile posters (whatever that means) ...
Being a relatively newbie here doesn't take away my right to read NGs. The
rude behaviour on ur part was unnecessary.
I apologize to tramp if he thinks that my earlier mail was rude.
Regards,
Sanjay
 
B

Blinky the Shark

Sanjay said:
And john, not everyone is an expert. I use OE for read NGs and I dont
know if it provides any features for killfile posters (whatever that
means) ... Being a relatively newbie here doesn't take away my right
to read NGs. The

You're certainly right about that!

On the other hand, it also doesn't mean everyone in the group has to
specially cater to the lowest common denominators of your experience and
your software. Learn, and come up to speed -- don't expect everyone
else to put *their* training wheels back on.
 
R

REMbranded

Blinky the Shark <[email protected]> wrote:
Sanjay Goel wrote:
You're certainly right about that!
On the other hand, it also doesn't mean everyone in the group has to
specially cater to the lowest common denominators of your experience and
your software. Learn, and come up to speed -- don't expect everyone
else to put *their* training wheels back on.

We were supposed to take them off?
 
J

John Fitzsimons

That's what I expected. having all of them in 1-2 posts would have been fine
with me. I certainly agree that all the posts were relevant to the NG but
having so many in so few time gives slight trouble following other post
threads.

It gives no "trouble" following other post threads at all. One simply
sorts one's posts by "thread". Each thread should be separated from
each other.
And john, not everyone is an expert. I use OE for read NGs and I dont know
if it provides any features for killfile posters (whatever that means) ...

Then ask. That's a good way to learn things. Killfiling is simply
a term used to explain filtering of certain topics/posters. If I
killfiled you then any post by "Sanjay Goel"
<[email protected]> would be marked as "read"
or simply deleted. Either way, as I only read "unread" posts I
wouldn't read anything that you had written directly. Though I
might see what you have written as a "quote".

Did you search the internet for a definition of "killfile" ? Or look
at your help file in OE ? You could also consider looking up such
terms as "bozo bin" and "filters" etc. Did you ask about killfiles in
any OE newsgroup ?

In any case you wouldn't need to killfile anyone. You could sort the
posts by "author" order and quickly/easily "mark read", or "delete",
all of Tramp's posts if you wanted to.
Being a relatively newbie here doesn't take away my right to read NGs. The
rude behaviour on ur part was unnecessary.
I apologize to tramp if he thinks that my earlier mail was rude.
Regards,
Sanjay

If one is a "newbie" then a question such as "Is there a reason why
Tramp makes individual posts rather than one combined one ?" Might
have been an idea.

Leaving out your implied criticism. By a "newbie" of a long standing,
and respected, poster here.

If you had asked that question then someone would have explained to
you that many of us prefer individual posts so that IF someone wants
to further discuss an individual recommendation the follow up doesn't
end up quoting a 300 line post.

Added to that some of us keep posts. If ten things are mentioned and
we are only interested in one then we can keep only the one and delete
the nine. Not easy if all ten are in one post.

Lastly, for those people who don't read/download all the posts a
header that reflects the single item mentioned within makes things
much easier for them to peruse. Also, if required later, to find
again.

Regards, John.

--
****************************************************
,-._|\ (A.C.F FAQ) http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
/ Oz \ John Fitzsimons - Melbourne, Australia.
\_,--.x/ http://www.aspects.org.au/index.htm
v http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/
 
B

Blinky the Shark

John said:
In any case you wouldn't need to killfile anyone. You could sort the
posts by "author" order and quickly/easily "mark read", or "delete",
all of Tramp's posts if you wanted to.

I devised a filtration plan quite a while ago that serves my purposes
well, that's a kind of a middle-ground approach to this (Tramp)
situation. I'll share it in case it might prove useful for anyone else.

It was for Tramp and Gordon (I don't know if the latter still posts
here). Because for a while they both were doing metric buttloads of
I've-never-used-this-but-here-are-links posts, I filtered out the
originals -- but if anything was notable enough for anyone else to
*comment* on, the ensuing discussion wasn't filtered. IOW, I didn't see
the "broadcasts", but I could see any discussions they generated
(including Tramp's and Gordon's *subsequent* posts in those
discussions).
 
J

John Fitzsimons

John Fitzsimons wrote:
I devised a filtration plan quite a while ago that serves my purposes
well, that's a kind of a middle-ground approach to this (Tramp)
situation. I'll share it in case it might prove useful for anyone else.
It was for Tramp and Gordon (I don't know if the latter still posts
here). Because for a while they both were doing metric buttloads of
I've-never-used-this-but-here-are-links posts, I filtered out the
originals -- but if anything was notable enough for anyone else to
*comment* on, the ensuing discussion wasn't filtered. IOW, I didn't see
the "broadcasts", but I could see any discussions they generated
(including Tramp's and Gordon's *subsequent* posts in those
discussions).

In newsgroups where I know nothing at all about the subject matter,
and am unlikely to be able to help anyone, I often kill all the
original posts. Then I, like the original poster, learn from the
answers and get through the newsgroups more quickly.

In Tramp's, and Gordon's, situation I am likely to do the reverse.
Keep the originals and kill all the follow-ups. :)


Regards, John.

--
****************************************************
,-._|\ (A.C.F FAQ) http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html
/ Oz \ John Fitzsimons - Melbourne, Australia.
\_,--.x/ http://www.aspects.org.au/index.htm
v http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/
 
G

Genna Reeney

3c273 said:
I would think that if Tramp was going to go to all that work, why not
cut and paste it into one post? It did seem a bit much IMHO.

The reason is that it makes it much easier to do follow-up discussion on a
specific program, rather than having different branches off the same thread.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Religious Programs 11
Textview 3
Timer Off 1
BackUp Studio 9
PrcView 1
Zip Notes 5
SimTel Freeware: Xtrans and Active Paper 7
Scanning inside of compressed files? 1

Top