Ken
Sometimes you can say the same with newly released software. Whether
it's beta or not makes no difference <G>!
I don't agree at all, Gerry. Yes. it's true that even released
software (and not just *recently* released software) can have serious
errors. But there's still a big difference between beta software and
released software. With released software, the manufacturer at least
thinks that there are no critical errors remaining, and it's safe to
use. With beta software, the manufacturer is normally aware that there
critical errors; if he thought there were none, he would release it,
rather than keeping it beta.
Note my last sentence, quoted below. I didn't say that there was risk
with beta software and no risk with released software; I said there
was "always *increased* risk when you run a test version."
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:16:16 -0600, "Tom [Pepper] Willett"
Ken:
RC1 has been released to MSDN and TechNet.
Yes, I know. But a Release Candidate is not a released version. It
is essentially a late-stage beta version, and is still very risky
to use.
The machine I'm running (testing) it on has had zero problems for
several day.
Glad to hear it. But that does not make it safe it run, and proves
nothing. It's a still a test version, not a released one, and there is
always increased risk when you run a test version.