XP - Prof slow after installing MicrosoftAntiSpyware

M

Martin

After installing and using MicrosoftAntiSpyware Beta for 2
days my XP-Pro became very slow using all my 512K memory -
leakage?

What to do?

Martin
 
B

Bill Sanderson

I would recommend uninstalling.

If that returns your system to its usual responsiveness, you could consider
reinstalling, verifying the effect still happens, and filing a Tools,
Suspected Spyware Report--giving clear details about the performance issue
you are seeing.

I'd then uninstall it again.

Filing the report may take some persistence. If you receive an error
message, simply try again, multiple times--it should go through eventually.
 
M

Martin

I did as told - after uninstall XP Pro works normal -
after reinstalling XP Pro was VERY slow again - I sent in
a Spyware report. Beautifull to see!!!!!

Regards,

Martin
 
M

Martin

I know ! - it is the Real Time Protection in combination
with WinVNC which frustrates XP Pro in working properly.
I disabled the Real Time Protection.

Regards,

Martin
 
R

Rick K

I've got xp-pro as well with 1.25gb of rdram and it is
running better than it ever was and I have antispyware
configured to the deepest of settings and have it enabled
for real-time protection as well.

First, uninstall it...but...keep a copy of it so it can
be installed again.

You must be logged on as admin to make these changes or
have admin privileges.

Try this...go to control panel then admin tools then
local security policy.
Open up your local policy settings and look for the
folder called security options. Open this up and scroll
down towards the bottom and although my setting is the
5th from the bottom that I want you to change, your's
might be different. Look for the setting that says:
Shutdown - Clear virtual memory settings. By default,
this setting is disabled. Enable this setting and then
click apply then ok then reboot. Upon rebooting, ensure
your temporary internet files, cookies, and history files
have been deleted and then run disk cleanup and then
defrag even if the defrag analyzer says you don't need
to.

After defragging, then click on start then "right-click"
on "my computer" and left-click on properties. When you
see the system properties window, locate and click on the
tab called advanced. Locate and click on the settings
tab in the performance area. Then locate and click on
the advanced tab and ensure your settings are for the
programs. Then under the virtual memory settings, click
on "change" and then when the virtual memory settings
opens, place a dot/checkmark into "custom size" and
depending on how much ram you currently have, use 1 1/2
times your current ram for the initial size and twice
that amount for the maximum. Then click "set" then "ok"
then "ok" then "ok" and reboot.

An example of the virtual memory settings that I want you
to enter are: I have 1.25gb ram so I use 1920 for my
initial and 3840 for my maximum.

Now that you have rebooted, defrag again although your
system analyzer says it will not need it but do it
again.

Lastly, look down on your lower right tool bar. If you
have more than 3-4 icons there, you need to remove some
of them since these are programs that are running all the
time and they're eating up your resources. Removing them
from startup does not mean they will not run...it means
they will still run but not all the time.

Click on "start" then "run" and type in the
command "msconfig" without the quotes then click "ok".
Locate and click on the tab called "startup". Note!!!
All items with chechmarks in their boxes are the ones
that are running all the time. Be careful which ones you
turn off by removing the checkmark. If you're unsure
which ones to turn off, go onto the net and surf to
http://www.sysinfo.org/startuplist.php and search for the
ones with checkmarks in them and see if you can turn them
off. Use the "search" function of this site to speed up
the process of finding them. If there is a blank next to
a box that is checkmarked, remove the checkmark in the
box. When finished, click "apply" then "ok"
then "restart". When it restarts, in the middle of your
screen, you'll notice a new window. Read the info and
then place a checkmark into the box and then click ok.
If you do not place a checkmark into this box, it will
not only reboot at that time but it will continue to
reboot until you place a checkmark into that box.

Finally, install Antispyware and enable real-time
protection then reboot then run it.
 
G

Gary J Dikkema

I would have disabled the VNC part...


Martin said:
I know ! - it is the Real Time Protection in combination
with WinVNC which frustrates XP Pro in working properly.
I disabled the Real Time Protection.

Regards,

Martin
 
B

Bill Sanderson

Thanks for helping beta test!

Martin said:
I did as told - after uninstall XP Pro works normal -
after reinstalling XP Pro was VERY slow again - I sent in
a Spyware report. Beautifull to see!!!!!

Regards,

Martin
 
B

Bill Sanderson

If you leave Real Time Protection on, but disable WinVNC, is everything
fine, as far as performance?

I have Microsoft Antispyware running on three Windows 2000 Servers which
also have UltraVNC running, with no such problems noted.

What VNC version?
 
B

BiggieX

I had the opposite.. I got a boost in performance from my
CPU being freed up from the spyware crap tying it up.

Try uninstalling and see if performance changes.

I've installed this on about 8 machines. Everything is
working fine!
 
M

Martin

When I leave Real Time Protection ON and disable WinVNC
Server the performance is PERFECT. But it is also PERFECT
when WinVNC server is running. There is something else
what is going on.

I use WinVNC Server 3.3.7 from 5/2003 in combinatieon with
Win2VNC (2001) on another PC. The problen (VERY SLOW)
only exists when Win2VNC on the other PC is running. The
running of WinVNC Server (after exit of Win2VNC) has NO
influence on the speed.

So the problem (slow down) only exists when I connect with
Win2VNC (on a PC wihout MS AntiSpyware) to the PC with
WinVNC Server (on the PC with MS AntiSpyware)
Just when I disconnect Win2VNC - the performance is perfect

Regards,

Martin
 
B

Bill Sanderson

I'm not a developer, so I have no idea what would be the possible causes of
the behavior you are observing. I do wonder about the mechanisms that
remote control programs use to pull screen painting information --those and
the compression involved might be resource-intensive in some way.

Thanks for taking the time to analyze what was happening and give the
details. Microsoft is observing in these groups, and this may help.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top