.. said:
What about namespace ONE::TWO::THREE instead of having to nest them? Being
able to specify namespaces like C# on one line would make refactoring
them easier and also code more readable.
Hello dot,
Opening and creating a nested namespace in one statement is not something
we're going to do in Whidbey. We and the ECMA committee have discussed it,
and as with a few things we're passing the issue to the ISO standards
committee. Hopefully, they'll feel compelled to fix it (we're involved, so
we'll try to compell them). It may be a while, as the ISO standards
committee is still in the early stages of creating a new version.
I read somewhere that the __gc, __property extension keywords are being
replaced to make them cleaner, is this true and if so where can I get the
docs on this. When will these be submitted to the ECMA?
This work has already been submitted to ECMA. In fact, we've already had two
standards committee meetings to work on it. Here's a link to a link to the
base candidate draft discussing what is happening with the new syntax.
http://blogs.msdn.com/branbray/archive/2003/11/21/51029.aspx