x86 or PowerPC for network processing

Discussion in 'AMD 64 Bit' started by Alexander Krizhanovsky, May 30, 2012.

  1. Hello,

    I'm not sure that I'm posting to the right group - sorry if I'm wrong.

    We need to choose hardware platform for our network processing
    appliance (common 1-2U server, not an embedded device). Currently
    we're going to use only base hardware, without specific hardware like
    NPU or FPGA. I have experience with Bivio 7000 platform - high
    performance platform for network processing, which is very close to
    what we're looking for. Bivio in its solutions uses Freescale MPC7448
    processors for application processing units (on which a user can run
    his or her custom applications like IDS, HTTP proxy etc).

    I had a look at MPC7448 specification: 2 32bit cores, 1.6Ghz, 32KB L1i
    and L1d, 1MB L2, 32 general purpose registers and emphasize on
    superscalar abilities (4 (3 + branch) instructions per clock). The CPU
    costs about $250. Intel Xeon E5606 costs about the same, but has 4
    64bit cores, 2.13Ghz, 32KB L1i and L1d, 256KB L2 per core, 8MB L3, 16
    general purpose registers.

    So why it has sense to use PowerPC processor instead of x86-46 for
    high performance network processing? From my point of view double
    number of cores and larger caches must beat double number of registers
    and maybe better instruction level parallelism (however x86-64 is also
    superscalar processor).

    The typical workload for our application is memory intensive
    operations which requires gigabytes of RAM with large work sets (i.e.
    we have relatively low cache hit).
    Alexander Krizhanovsky, May 30, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  2. On Jun 2, 12:29 am, Yousuf Khan <> wrote:
    > I would say it's using PPC processor because it's likely cheaper. Even
    > though you listed a price of $250, I'm sure it's available for a lot
    > cheaper than that for embedded applications.

    Hi Yousuf,

    thanks for the reply.

    I took the price from
    , for MC7448VU1600LD model. Also I found AMD Opteron 4280 which costs
    about the same ($255), but has 8 64bit cores, 2.8Ghz, 48KB L1i and
    L1d, 1MB L2 per core, 8MB shared L3.

    However it seems AMD Opteron and Intel Xeon consume much more power.
    So probably, performance to power consumption ratio is also the
    Alexander Krizhanovsky, Jun 1, 2012
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. J_Madlangbayan

    X86-64 upgrade from XP +3200

    J_Madlangbayan, Apr 20, 2004, in forum: AMD 64 Bit
  2. Yousuf Khan

    New Intel compilers for x86-64

    Yousuf Khan, Oct 2, 2004, in forum: AMD 64 Bit
  3. Yousuf Khan

    Pretty good explanation of x86-64 by HP

    Yousuf Khan, Dec 5, 2004, in forum: AMD 64 Bit
    Bill Davidsen
    Dec 22, 2004
  4. Johnny Rebel

    windows x86-64

    Johnny Rebel, Dec 10, 2004, in forum: AMD 64 Bit
    Dec 21, 2004
  5. Vivek  Mohan

    Udis86 Disassembler for x86 and x86-64

    Vivek Mohan, Feb 4, 2006, in forum: AMD 64 Bit
    Vivek Mohan
    Feb 4, 2006