WinFX -- The Successor to .NET

J

John Bailo

Looks like .NET is old
http://www.winfx247.com/247reference/default.aspx

<quote>
Never heard of Avalon? Wow, didn't know those people still existed :)
Anyway, these are the WinFX newgroups (microsoft.public.winfx.*). WinFX is
the next generation set of API's for Windows codename 'Longhorn'. Avalon is
the codename for the new presentation system that will replace the old
GDI(+). Some key concepts:
- acceleration through GPU
- no more "flickering"
- vector based graphics
- XAML, a markup language for Windows Forms (although that's only part of
it. You can even make console applications using only XAML. It's like HTML
for Windows Forms on steroids)

Hope this explains some,
</quote>
 
T

Tom Shelton

Looks like .NET is old
http://www.winfx247.com/247reference/default.aspx

<quote>
Never heard of Avalon? Wow, didn't know those people still existed :)
Anyway, these are the WinFX newgroups (microsoft.public.winfx.*). WinFX is
the next generation set of API's for Windows codename 'Longhorn'. Avalon is
the codename for the new presentation system that will replace the old
GDI(+). Some key concepts:
- acceleration through GPU
- no more "flickering"
- vector based graphics
- XAML, a markup language for Windows Forms (although that's only part of
it. You can even make console applications using only XAML. It's like HTML
for Windows Forms on steroids)

Hope this explains some,
</quote>

WinFx is the new Windows API... It isn't a replacement for .NET - it is
..NET.

--
Tom Shelton
Powered By Gentoo Linux 1.4
"...[Arthur] leapt to his feet like an author hearing the
phone ring..."

- Who says that the character of Arthur isn't
autobiographical?
 
?

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Lin=F8nut?=

Error BR-549: MS DRM 1.0 rejects the following post from Tom Shelton:
WinFx is the new Windows API... It isn't a replacement for .NET - it is
.NET.

Does WinFx use handles?
 
J

JTK

Linønut said:
Error BR-549: MS DRM 1.0 rejects the following post from Tom Shelton:




Does WinFx use handles?

It's (D)COM(+) (or whatever they call it these days), so no, why do you
ask? It can interact with handles though (e.g. GDI+ can talk to HWNDs
to a certain extent, etc).
 
E

Erik Funkenbusch

It's (D)COM(+) (or whatever they call it these days), so no, why do you
ask? It can interact with handles though (e.g. GDI+ can talk to HWNDs
to a certain extent, etc).

Uhhh.. No. It's not DCOM+, or any variation.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top