D
Davis Straub
For years I've been using Word to edit issues of the Oz Report (see URL
below). Using a previous issue of the Oz Report I cut the new series of
articles from the Word version of my new OR issue and paste the new material
into the next issue of the OR in FrontPage.
Previous to FrontPage 2003 when I used FP 2000 this process added little
bits of junk, and the HTML code in the template (which is just the previous
issue), would be altered. I purchased FrontPage 2003, because it was stated
that it was cleaner and didn't change the HTMl code. Both promises have held
true.
I like using all the power and ease of Word XP (I don't have Word 2003) to
edit the document and then copy and page the results into FrontPage for the
HTML version of the OR. I also copy and paste the Word version into a blank
text page in Outlook Express to send off as a text version of the latest Oz
Report issue.
I also copy a slightly edited version of the FrontPage version of the OR
issue (which goes onto my web site) into a rich text page in Outlook Express
to go out as an HTML formatted OR e-zine.
The only issue that has arisen is how FP2003 unlike FP2000 adds:
style="font-family: Comic Sans MS; color: blue; text-decoration: underline;
text-underline: single" to hyperlinks, while FP2000 didn't do this.
I define the text styles in Word and have corresponding text styles in FP.
This means that each paragraph in FP starts with the text style definition:
<p class="AutomaticNormal">, for example, but this is a small penalty to pay
for the ease of editing. I would be nice if FP could use the SPAN tag to
better handle this, but it doesn't.
I'm surprised that many of you here seem to think that its a poor idea to
use Word and FP together. I mean, I thought that was the point, after all.
below). Using a previous issue of the Oz Report I cut the new series of
articles from the Word version of my new OR issue and paste the new material
into the next issue of the OR in FrontPage.
Previous to FrontPage 2003 when I used FP 2000 this process added little
bits of junk, and the HTML code in the template (which is just the previous
issue), would be altered. I purchased FrontPage 2003, because it was stated
that it was cleaner and didn't change the HTMl code. Both promises have held
true.
I like using all the power and ease of Word XP (I don't have Word 2003) to
edit the document and then copy and page the results into FrontPage for the
HTML version of the OR. I also copy and paste the Word version into a blank
text page in Outlook Express to send off as a text version of the latest Oz
Report issue.
I also copy a slightly edited version of the FrontPage version of the OR
issue (which goes onto my web site) into a rich text page in Outlook Express
to go out as an HTML formatted OR e-zine.
The only issue that has arisen is how FP2003 unlike FP2000 adds:
style="font-family: Comic Sans MS; color: blue; text-decoration: underline;
text-underline: single" to hyperlinks, while FP2000 didn't do this.
I define the text styles in Word and have corresponding text styles in FP.
This means that each paragraph in FP starts with the text style definition:
<p class="AutomaticNormal">, for example, but this is a small penalty to pay
for the ease of editing. I would be nice if FP could use the SPAN tag to
better handle this, but it doesn't.
I'm surprised that many of you here seem to think that its a poor idea to
use Word and FP together. I mean, I thought that was the point, after all.