While there may be something that Outlook 2003 writes into the message that
AOL interprets as indicating that the message is spam, for them to blame
Outlook is ridiculous - *they're* the ones rejecting the message, after all,
and are the only ISP I've heard of that is doing so. They are the only ones
that know what their criteria for rejecting mail are, and if they care about
their customers they'll figure out why they are rejecting the messages and
fix it.
As a guess, the one difference that I know of between Outlook 2002 and
Outlook 2003 that they might be triggering this on is that Outlook 2003 does
not write a field in the message called "Message-Id", relying on the server
to fill that in. While this is perfectly legitimate per Internet mail
standards, AOL may have decided to reject such mail as spam.
--
Jeff Stephenson
Outlook Development
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights