They should have made it an OPTION that by default is off. Typical of
Microsoft to turn it on by default and make it difficult to tweak.
It is an option, why the capitals? Did you mean to emphasize OFF maybe?
IMHO, they should have done the same as any 'nix including OS X, no option
to turn it off. Prepare for this eventuality in future versions of windows.
The truth is Microsoft by forcing UAC on the masses without warning
has waved the white flag of surrender and by so doing has admitted it
is incapable of writing a secure operating system and that all prior
versions of Windows were so damn buggy and prone to hacker attack and
exploit from so many outside sources they had no choice other than to
impose some superficial warning system which is really all UAC is
since on it's own it offers little actual protection.
Wow, that's a great example of a run-on sentence.
UAC is about making the least privilege security mode that has existed since
NT 4.0 radically easier to use via over the shoulder elevation. Because it
was so difficult to use a restricted user account, OEMs and so called "power
users" insisted on running as the equivalent of root. There is absolutely no
debate that running as administrator all the time is patently unsafe.
check out
http://brandonlive.com/2007/01/31/vista-myths-users-will-just-click-ok/ to
dispel one of the myths you're eluding to.
That's not to say there isn't room for improvement. The double prompting for
creating a new folder is crazy, and there needs to be some system
implemented to ease the initial setup.
The only real benefit is on the Internet side which is also possible to
implement
with other things like firewalls and malware detectors.
This is incorrect, restricted mode IE under vista is impossible to achieve
with UAC off and can not be replicated on XP or via third party tools.
SandboxIE isn't the same at all.