Visual Studio 2003 and .NET 2.0

G

Guest

Visual Studio 2003 "sees" by default .NET 1.0 or 1.1. Is it possible to use
version 2.x as the default .NET package in development?
 
S

Stefan Z Camilleri

Visual Studio 2003 "sees" by default .NET 1.0 or 1.1. Is it possible to
use
version 2.x as the default .NET package in development?
Click to expand...

No, Visual Studio 2003 was not designed to handle .NET 2.0. There are far
too many changes in the new .NET, including syntax changes that the VS2003
IDE's parser would not recognize (the fancy colors basiclly), so you're
better off using Visual Studio 2005.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

.NET Framework 2.0 installation 6
Suggestion to learn .net 2.0 and above 6
ASP.NET version question 2
Liquid Technologies Release Liquid XML Studio 2014 1
Visual Studio 2003 & 2005 Side-By-Side 2
Using Visual Studio .NET 2005 to compile to ASP.NET 1.1 2
install old visual studio .net version 2
Visual Studio 2003. NET Installation Issue 1

Top