Vista has corrupted 30% of all of my JPG files

X

XS11E

tewkes said:
Problem still not solved...

Did you plug your camera into someone else's computer that's running
Vista and see what happens?

I've had no problems, running both Vista Ultimate Edition 64 bit and
Vista Home Premium 32 bit on my previous computer and my current HP
M7750N Media Center computer. My camera uses xD cards but I can try a
Sony Memory Stick if that'll help any?

I use a card reader FWIW.
 
A

Adam Albright

Problem still not solved... here are some responses to questions posted in
this forum.

Because I was curious I spent about an hour searching on the web on
this problem. Sadly, like the calculating time remaining issue a LOT
of people seem to have your 30% of JPEG corrupted problem, yet nobody
yet has pinned down what the heck is causing it.

Since it is random and not even downloading the same image reproduces
the problem I would think that narrows it down to hardware or just a
very bad run of bad luck where the memory on each card is bad. I would
lean towards the card reader is bad on either the camera or PC end. If
you have the option have you tried to format one of the SK cards on
the computer?

Does the camera support Vista? Sadly you're stuck in the middle of a
finger pointing contest Where HP will blame Microsoft and Microsoft
will blame HP and both with sooner later probably try to blame whoever
made the camera if that's a different brand.
 
K

keepout

Problem still not solved... here are some responses to questions posted in
this forum.

1) All hard drives - external and internal are NTFS, not FAT formatted.
Won't state for fact, but my 250 meg external USB drive formats to FAT. It
could be possible yours should be FAT also..
2) Issue is still happening even on new pictures I take. This happens
whether downloaded to PC by USB or by the internal card reader. Always using
SD card, but I've tried 3 cards all with the same results. About 1 in 5
pictures are goofy now.
30% bad, but only sometimes. Not a good starting point to troubleshoot the
problem. Hmm. How many pix and what resolution can you use with the SD card ?
Also how many pix & what resolution ARE you using ?
What program are you using to move the pictures off the SD card ? Hmm.This
is something I hadn't taken into account. I have 2 digital cameras, but no
removable cards. I use a straight USB cable from cameras to computer. I assume
that you have a cable to plug into the camera to the computer leaving theSD
card in the camera. IOW: 30% - 70% . The camera came with built in memory[30%]
and you added a ???? meg SD card [70%]. I'm wondering if it's possible that's
the problem... Try taking some pix without the SD card, and make the transfers
and see how transfers fare then.
If that shows a problem [you said 3 different SD cards same problem] it might
be the interface in the camera that links the SD card to the camera.
3) SD cards always formatted on camera, not on PC.
Just a guess, but that wouldn't suggest NTFS format.
NTFS didn't exist 10 years ago either. or USB 2.
4) Another strange fact I've noticed... not always the same pictures have
the problems. If I download, then put the SD card back in the camera and
then re-download to PC, different images are corrupt each time. Usuallythe
same, but sometimes okay and sometimes the same image is not okay.
Sounds like contacts in the camera may be arcing. Rubber pencil eraser, or if
the SD card is hard to reach you might need the electronics spray cleaner.
Ear Q-tips and denatured alcohol, but don't drip the alcohol into the works.
hold the works over head, and wipe, allowing the alcohol to use gravity and
drop straight down without settling in the camera innards. or if there isa
reputable camera dealer, let them do the cleaning and explain the problem..

What do you use to view / manipulate the images on the SD Card ? Windows
Explorer ? Have you tried IV to manipulate the images on the SD card ?
5) I understand the concepts of troubleshooting. I've done all I can to
rule out certain things. So far it's down to the PC, which could include
Vista. PC is HP a6110n if that helps. BIOS version 5.08 5/4/2007.
I was under the impression you have 100% success on the XP, but somethingwith
a USB cable and a Sony USB 40g drive causes corruption copying to the Vista
except when plugging the SD card directly into the Vista.
Does the SD card have 100% of the images, or just 70% of the images ? I covered
most above.
6) I'd be happy to have a "professional" look at the PC, but I'd sure like
to know who qualifies as "professional" these days. I've contacted
Microsoft, they tell me to contact HP (after hours on hold of course). I get
in touch with HP (apparently in India), the guy tells me it's going to cost
money just to have me talk to someone. I say forget it. Why is it I buy a
$1000 computer and nobody will touch it. If the auto industry was like this
with their warranties, it would not be accepted at all. I'd be happy toget
some references for "professionals" that can speak English and can actual be
helpful and not just have be try things I've already tried.
I spent an entire day with an Indian M$ pro with my 1 FREE support. I knew more
than he did, and spent 90% of the time figuring out what he was saying. Idon't
waste any time with M$. I'm just glad this thing doesn't use the validation
stuff.
Don't get me wrong, this forum has provided me some insight and I'm
appreciative of the free help I'm getting. I just can't believe the problem
I'm having is that hard to solve and here it is almost 6 weeks later andI'm
no further than I was with the issue.
I might suggest you try and repost the entire problem. Prep your post offline
omitting nothing, and maybe you can snag someone new here. Or do I like do when
I get a real nasty problem, and take it over to the GRC tech news group. I
seldom use them, cause I seldom have a problem I can't solve. But I have used
them twice in the past, and had things fixed after the first few replies.
Well Vista is a horse of a different color. I had to have BellSouth send a tech
to get online when I hooked up the HP Vista HP. They had to add a pigtailon
the modem line to get it online. where as it was online 1-2 years on the XP
just fine and no mods.
try and layout what works and what doesn't work in some sort of form layout ie:
SD USB drive camera
Vista fails works fails etc...
XP works works works
extrapolate on images how many & resolution. Where on the card are the bad ones
located ? Instead of thinking it's the card, it could be the camera that's only
filling 70% of the card with good stuff..
You did say it's the same on 3 cards...
[which program is good ?]
, then okay in another program,
Log off ???? you mean quit the program ?
there's plenty of free web space available for posting images. Can't hurtto
see what we're talking about.

That could be a possibility, but I don't believe SD cards, Digital cameras, or
USB drives existed 10 years ago.

You can pick up a $15.00 Radio shack digital spy camera. Don't expect anykind
of worthwhile photos. It worked fine on my XP, and now on the Vista. But that
could rule out a camera and transfers to the computers as the problem.
It's about the size of a Jumbo Sharpie. Uses 2 AAA batteries.
And comes with software to download from the camera.
========================================================
I'm entirely under the impression it's the fact that the SD card is only a
portion of the internal camera memory. The larger portion, but still justa
portion.
leaving the SD card in the camera, what happens with a transfer ? # of pix, and
resolution, and # good and # bad...

transfer from the camera with the SD card removed. What happens ? # of pix, and
resolution, and # good and # bad...
 
C

Charlie Tame

Have you tried copying a good picture several times (Just changing the
file name each time you save)?

Have you tried the same with a bad picture?

If not and you decide to try does the good one eventually go bad? Do
the bad ones change in any way (Not necessarily get worse).

Do any of the files' "Properties" change between a good copy and a bad
copy, e.g. file size? You may not see this in the step above but do you
see changes between a good and a bad copy from the camera. Are there any
changes between good and bad when loaded into IV etc?

See the drive to same drive copy is using the same hardware, from
anything else to that drive is likely going via other chips.


(I believe you said the bad ones stay bad when copied back to XP but
correct me if that's not right).

Do you transfer much of anything else to the Vista machine, aside from
comparing properties it would be a PITA to (Say) listen to 10 copies of
an MP3 for example but if this problem is showing up copying from a
floppy then you don't need very big files for it to happen.
 
C

Charlie Tame

Charlie Tame wrote:


Oops, forgot to add that I am wondering if there's something trying to
do a smart write ahead and it's writing something to the drive's buffer
which is not actually making it to the disk but instead being
overwritten as a result of some bus timing error, this could well be
random or dependent on load. I appreciate this is guessing at pretty
long odds but we're running out of easy options here :)

It is odd that it seems only to be pictures.
 
A

andy

I would try to isolate the problem to either hardware or sofware by
replacing the hard drive by another one and installing an earlier
version of Windows. Then if the problem still persists, it's probably
a hardware problem; if the problem goes away, it's a software problem.
 
K

keepout

The downgrade to XP has however caused me other problems and I have had
to locate nVIDIA motherboard chipset drivers and Realtek audio
management software to make it work. The last step is to locate an XP
video driver for my ATI card which i'm having trouble finding, but
Just go to ATI, but don't ask me for any ATI help. I had ATI for 6 years too
long.
 
G

Guest

Here's another frustrating update:

1) Still have the problem. Absolutely no changes since before. Still about
20-30% of pictures I download (any method possible) from both digital cameras
(SD and Memory Stick media).
2) I completely blew and and reformatted the 2 storage HDs I use (1 internal
+ 1 external). Both NTFS formatted. The only drive not reformatted was my
main OS drive.
3) I do not know anyone with Vista, so I have yet to test downloading photos
direct from camera to another PC with Vista. I have tried downloading photos
to an XP laptop with no differences seen. Pictures still jumbled.
4) As far as I can tell it's jus jpg files still, but I have not opened
every mp3 on my PC to confirm integrity.

I'm not getting anywhere with this at all and becoming more and more
frustrated daily. I have considered all recommendations so far to no avail.

Could it be some strange virus doing this? I have Norton Antivirus with up
to date definitions. Grasping for straws here.

I did just get a blue screen error for the first time on my new computer
today. Stated it was a kcom.sys page fault error. Not sure if it is related.

Thanks again for all of the help and suggestions. Keep them coming.

tewkes
 
K

keepout

Here's another frustrating update:

1) Still have the problem. Absolutely no changes since before. Still about
20-30% of pictures I download (any method possible) from both digital cameras
(SD and Memory Stick media).
2) I completely blew and and reformatted the 2 storage HDs I use (1 internal
+ 1 external). Both NTFS formatted. The only drive not reformatted wasmy
main OS drive.
3) I do not know anyone with Vista, so I have yet to test downloading photos
direct from camera to another PC with Vista. I have tried downloading photos
to an XP laptop with no differences seen. Pictures still jumbled.
you could always take it to a local store or shop that sells Vistas and ask if
they'd let you download to their machine.
Is Vista up to date ?
4) As far as I can tell it's jus jpg files still, but I have not opened
every mp3 on my PC to confirm integrity.

I'm not getting anywhere with this at all and becoming more and more
frustrated daily. I have considered all recommendations so far to no avail.
Did you take this to a camera news group ?
I know you didn't take this to the GRC news group forum like I suggested.

Something about your statement above doesn't ring true.
IIRC, you said you had 100% correct transfers by plugging the stick directly
into the XP, can't recall if you plugged it into the Vista.. But IIRC yousaid
transfers to the XP worked fine.

You never did say how pictures taken with NO STICKS installed in the camera
worked..
IE: Sticks are an accessory to EXPAND the total number of images you can take.
you quoted 30% & 70%. That would be about right for the division of images
INSIDE a camera. 30% on built in memory, and 70% to the stick.
When you use a stick, I'm guessing they disable internal memory so when you
remove the stick, you remove ALL the images.
When was the last time you formatted the internal memory [30%] of the camera
?
Could it be some strange virus doing this? I have Norton Antivirus withup
to date definitions. Grasping for straws here.

I did just get a blue screen error for the first time on my new computer
today. Stated it was a kcom.sys page fault error. Not sure if it is related.
learn to google. google for kcom.sys.
 
G

Guest

Thanks for the insight. This could be plausible in my situation as well
since all of my old jpgs were backed up on a WD MyBook hooked up via USB 2.0
to my new Vista device. Even those files that were on the My Book prior to
Vista now appear 30% corrupted. You're absolutely right about the files
still appearing correct on the cameras even if they show corrupt on the Vista
machine.

What I don't understand is that both cameras are fairly new. The Canon just
came out about 4-5 months ago. Also, why if this is the problem, don't more
people have this issue than are reported? I have used Firewire to download
videos from my Sony Camcorder and that has had no corruption issues at all,
so this must be related only to the USB drivers.

I cringe at having to downgrade OS to XP, but if that solved your problem
than it's worth it. I really wish M$ would read these and do something about
the issue in Vista.

Thanks again!

tewkes
 
K

keepout

What I don't understand is that both cameras are fairly new. The Canon just
came out about 4-5 months ago. Also, why if this is the problem, don't more
That could be border line Vista compatible, and something that new shouldhave
come with some sort of install CD with programs designed specifically for
removing images from the camera. IOW: The drivers for your camera are on that
CD.

I'd like to see a diagram of what you're talking about when the USB transfers
fail,, but the XP transfers don't.

simple box diagram would work...

XP Vista
------------ --------------
| SD |<-usb------>| SD |
------------ ---------------
Or an actual picture of the setup that fails.
 
G

gnassif

Kris,

I have noticed that over 2 dozen of my jpg photos have been corrupted
or damaged too. I don't understand what is happening. I "do" suspect
Vista as the culprit.

I am a part time wedding photographer and rely on my hard drive for
storing photos right after an event. In the event of a hard drive
failure, I alwasy back up all of the original phtos to a DVD-R ...but
how do I know that the original jpg's won't be corrupt once they are
copied from my flash card to my hard drive?

This has never happend to me before when i used windows xp. This
problem has only come up once I started using Windows Vista. The
corrupt jpg photos are occuring on my new HP Pavilion dv6000 series
notebook (vista home premium, pre-installed), and my homemade home-
theater pc (with vista home premium oem).

The thumbnail photos appear fine, but when I double click on a corrupt
jpg, it will show a few lines of the photo, and the remaining photos
are grey.


Microsoft better have an answer for this.

-george
 
C

Charlie Tame

Kris,

I have noticed that over 2 dozen of my jpg photos have been corrupted
or damaged too. I don't understand what is happening. I "do" suspect
Vista as the culprit.

I am a part time wedding photographer and rely on my hard drive for
storing photos right after an event. In the event of a hard drive
failure, I alwasy back up all of the original phtos to a DVD-R ...but
how do I know that the original jpg's won't be corrupt once they are
copied from my flash card to my hard drive?

This has never happend to me before when i used windows xp. This
problem has only come up once I started using Windows Vista. The
corrupt jpg photos are occuring on my new HP Pavilion dv6000 series
notebook (vista home premium, pre-installed), and my homemade home-
theater pc (with vista home premium oem).

The thumbnail photos appear fine, but when I double click on a corrupt
jpg, it will show a few lines of the photo, and the remaining photos
are grey.


Microsoft better have an answer for this.

-george


Have you by any chance had this happen to the same photo twice and they
both come out corrupt but "Different"?

Since the picture sent twice should be two identical "Streams" then any
difference might indicate some form of "Timing" or "Buffering" error
while the same corruption might suggest something (A combination of
bytes for example) in the stream causing some part of the receiving
software to get confused.

Haven't had time to follow this thread properly so sorry if that's
already been considered. I can;t see this being a problem atcually
"Writing" to the drive since with the size of the other data people will
be writing could also be expected to show it, and obviously it seems
only to be pictures.

Obviously it's a mystery that needs to be solved :)
 
M

Mark Bourne

I only mentioned PS as there is a 100% problem with PS3 files.
I don't use PS 3 either, but the files are on the web.
You should have some software from the camera to actually do the downloads.
I'd try and find it.
Try irfanview. and see if there's actually a problem with the files BEFORE doing anything with them.

if it's corrupted that's it. no amount of copying is going to restore pixels that were never there.

IOW: You're writing a bad copy twice over what you think is a bad copy. There's something else going on. And I'd suspect the software making the transfers.
Use IV to import from the camera.

What I know about USB 1 & USB 2 is below.
I think there is something like a USB 1 to USB 2 converter, but I wouldn't go that far yet.
They're 2 different things. One more way to make you replace ALL your old equipment. See stuff that's more than a year old = OLD equipment.

What I've said below describes some of the differences between USB 1.1
and USB 2, and how hardware from the two standards works together (with
no need for converters!). It does not contain anything which may be
useful in solving the OP's problem, so if that's all you're looking for
and you're not otherwise interested, don't waste your time reading it
;o) I just thought some people (especially the person I am replying to)
might be interested.

USB 1.1 and USB 2 are compatible standards. USB 1 (which didn't last
long before USB 1.1 was produced) and USB 1.1 support devices working at
"low speed" (1.5Mb/s) and "full speed" (12Mb/s). USB 2 also supports
devices working at these speeds, as well as "high speed" (480Mb/s).
Faster (and more expensive) hardware is required for devices to cope
with high speed data, so a device which only supports low or full speed
will probably never work at high speed regardless of what you do in
firmware. But that's not a problem, because USB 2 controllers support
devices using low, full or high speed. A common misconception is that
USB 2 is only high speed, and that any low or full speed device is a USB
1.1 device. Almost all modern USB devices are USB 2 devices, even things
like mice and keyboards which typically only use low speeds (cos no-one
types THAT fast!)

USB 1.1 devices work with USB 2 controllers and hubs, just using the
lower speed. In the case of plugging a low or full speed device (whether
it is USB 1.1 or USB 2) into a USB 2 hub, the hub does convert the data
to high speed so that the slower devices do not slow down communication
with high speed devices plugged into the same hub - perhaps that is
where you get the idea of a USB 1 to USB 2 converter from.

To comply with the USB 2 specification, high speed devices must either
work at a lower speed (possibly with reduced functionality) when you
plug them into a USB 1.1 controller or hub, or not do anything at all if
they can't work at all at a lower speed. For a hard disk, this would
just mean that it would take longer to transfer data since a lower speed
is being used. For some high quality real-time audio or video device,
maybe it would work at a reduced quality, or maybe the quality would not
be acceptable if it used a lower speed, so that device may just refuse
to do anything if connected to a USB 1.1 controller, and would still be
compliant with the USB 2 spec.

No conversion is needed to use USB 1.1 devices on a USB 2 controller, or
to use USB 2 devices on a USB 1.1 controller. The USB 2 spec is designed
to be compatible in both directions with USB 1.1.
 
K

keepout

(e-mail address removed) wrote:
What I've said below describes some of the differences between USB 1.1
and USB 2, and how hardware from the two standards works together (with
no need for converters!). It does not contain anything which may be

Too technical for me. I'm just following the thread now to see what the problem
is.

IE: I just downloaded v 3.20 drivers & program for my TV. 1 day, and I'm going
back to the previous version.

Is it driver or program ? I have no idea what's buggy, let the manufacturer
work out the bugs. It's their wallet...
 
K

keepout

For the same reason that I was the only one that couldn't get Nero 7's wave
editor and soundtrax to run. I have a HDTV GT on my machine and those 2
programs ALWAYS attempted to initialize by loading a DLL of the TV's editor.
Since the editor itself was worthless, I just traced the offending DLL. renamed
it, and the Nero programs worked semi fine after that. Neither one can't stop
crashing if it attempts to load a mis named file. ie: xxx.ac3 named xxx.wav
will crash them both.
If someone can tell me that they have no problem interconnecting a 2003
Sony DSC-V1 camera or a 2003 Poketec Datastor 40G external drive with
the original firmware and drivers to Vista via USB to transfer or
display pictures, then that would blow 'my' hypothesis right out of the
water. Both of these units are now discontinued, so I would consider
myself to be lucky if anyone bothered to rewrite the firmware.
dig into your event logs and see what sort of warnings and crashes it's
recording. I hate this new Vista way of handling the events. I used to beable
to delete the logs. And start with a clean slate. Now It takes work to sift
thru those logs and see what's what.
Or you can delete 1 entry at a time of 70000 entries.
In your case, if your camera is still on the market, then there's hope.
And yes, everyone who has your camera 'should' have the same problem
with Vista if my theory holds true.
You really haven't been using computers very long huh ? Even Murphy's law
doesn't cover the crap a computer can do.

Since the thread I was following claimed the problem was on 3 different memory
things, that's a variable that makes the camera a constant. meaning take a look
at the pictures ON the camera BEFORE moving them anywhere.
try several programs to view the images BEFORE moving them. If they appear
correct with all programs, I'd use those programs to make the move.

You might also try a trial version of Total commander to move them. I useit
all the time between drives, and these memory sticks are just additional
drives.
the newest total commander has a thumbnail view which would give you a preview
before moving. AND after.
 
M

Mark Bourne

wbarbourca said:
This thread is starting to become confusing. There are at least 3
people here who have reported problems:

tewkes
(e-mail address removed)
wbarbourca

I believe that we have to take care to identify who we're responding,
to as questions and suggestions for the problem descriptions stated are
starting to get 'blended'.

It has got quite confusing. I was replying to the post I was quoting,
which seemed to be stating that USB 1 and 2 are incompatible. This is
not the case, and I was trying to clarify that (and explain a bit more
for anyone technically minded who is interested).
In reply to Tewkes:


It doesn't matter how old the camera is. If it doesn't explicitly say
'Vista compatible', then we can't assume it is. It may have been tested
only against older OSs.


If someone can tell me that they have no problem interconnecting a 2003
Sony DSC-V1 camera or a 2003 Poketec Datastor 40G external drive with
the original firmware and drivers to Vista via USB to transfer or
display pictures, then that would blow 'my' hypothesis right out of the
water.

That wouldn't necessarily blow your hypothesis out of the water. Older
hardware may be compatible with Vista, even if it hasn't been tested.
I'd expect any disk drive or other storage device which fully complies
with the "USB Mass Storage" standard to work with Vista without
modification, since both Vista AND the device should be compliant with
that common standard. That's not to say any storage device which worked
on XP WILL work on Vista - it's possible that the device is not actually
quite compliant with the standard due to bugs which XP ignores but Vista
doesn't.
Both of these units are now discontinued, so I would consider
myself to be lucky if anyone bothered to rewrite the firmware.

In your case, if your camera is still on the market, then there's hope.
And yes, everyone who has your camera 'should' have the same problem
with Vista if my theory holds true.

I'm not sure who was having problems with several devices (as you say,
this thread has become a bit confused), but for that person / those
people, it is POSSIBLE that the problem is with your USB controller in
the PC, or the Vista drivers for that controller. I've suggested a few
things to try below to help track down where the problem is. Apologies
if they are not all relevant to the same person, or if you have already
tried some of them! I realise some of them require resources that not
everyone has access to (another computer - maybe try using a friend's
computer, especially if they have Vista, if you don't have one; spare
USB controller - you might know someone with one lying around, but
they're usually on-board these days), or you might need to find someone
with more technical knowledge to help with some of them (I hope none of
you actually know me.....! ;o) ), so just try what you can.

- try the troublesome devices on another (preferably Vista) computer and
see if you can reproduce the results there. I don't just mean open the
corrupt files there and see that they are still corrupt - if they are
already corrupt they will stay that way. I mean take new photos, check
that they transfer correctly to the second computer, copy to the
external hard disk (using the second computer), check that they still
open correctly. If you have good copies on the external drive, try
opening them on the troublesome computer and see if they display
correctly there. Try copying some to the troublesome computer's hard
disk, view them from there, rename, and copy back to the USB disk. Have
the copies become corrupt? If you don't have access to another computer
with Vista, one with another OS will still help, but if everything works
fine on that machine it still leaves the computer's hardware and the OS
as potential problems, rather than just the hardware. The aim is to try
changing one thing at a time, so it is preferable not to change the
computer hardware and the OS at the same time.

- try copying other files apart from just pictures to the external
drive. Do they also get corrupted?

- see if any other USB devices apart from storage devices exhibit
strange behaviour. Many digital cameras act as a storage device for the
purpose of transferring photos, so if you have a general problem with
storage devices this could affect the camera as well as USB disk drives
and card readers. If you find that mice, keyboards, and other low speed
devices have no problem, but that all high-speed devices (marked with a
"USB High Speed" logo) do have problems, it is more likely to be down to
a faulty controller, or the driver for the controller - I have
experienced this in the past, although the devices usually do not work
at all rather than appearing to work but corrupting data.

- try putting another USB 2 controller in your malfunctioning computer,
ie. USB PCI card in a PC, or USB PCMCIA/Cardbus card in a laptop. I'm
not suggesting you buy one just for troubleshooting unless you are more
certain that the controller is the problem, but try to borrow one if you
don't happen to have one lying around. If that fixes the problem, you
probably have a faulty USB controller. Either send the computer back for
repair if it is still under warranty, keep the spare USB controller you
put in if it's not needed elsewhere, buy a new USB controller if not
(they cost about £10-£20 here in the UK), or consider paying for it to
be repaired (probably more expensive than just buying a new controller!)

- try with a different operating system on the malfunctioning computer,
eg. download a "Live" Linux CD (eg. Knoppix) and boot from that - doing
so allows you to run Linux without installing it on the hard disk. I
suggest using a "Live" CD because installing another OS onto the hard
disk over the top of Vista would require making a backup of any data you
don't want to lose, and I wouldn't trust a backup given the problem
you're investigating! It also saves the hassle of actually installing
another OS and reinstalling Vista later. You may need to find someone
else who's familiar with Linux to help you here. I'm not suggesting
using Linux as a permanent solution, but I do find it very useful in
eliminating the OS as the cause of a problem. If you still get problems
under the alternative OS, then the OS is very unlikely to be the cause,
and it is likely a hardware problem. If you don't have problems in the
alternative OS, it could be that there is a problem with the Vista
drivers for either the USB controller or affected hardware.

- I wonder if all the people posting here with problems have computers
from the same manufacturer, or at least using the same motherboard or
on-board USB controller...?
As I say, I believe that it 'may' be more likely that it is the camera
manufacture who needs to upgrade their firmware and drivers to be Vista
compatible.

Apologies for the long list of things to try. I hope it helps at least
some of you work out where the problem lies.

Mark.
 
K

keepout

That wouldn't necessarily blow your hypothesis out of the water. Older
hardware may be compatible with Vista, even if it hasn't been tested.
I'd expect any disk drive or other storage device which fully complies
with the "USB Mass Storage" standard to work with Vista without
modification, since both Vista AND the device should be compliant with

FWIW: Vista exterminated both hardware & software when it came out. If I'd
wanted [and I didn't] to install Vista on my XP, It would have required buying
a new video card and throwing away a $400.00 one. Since the XP died, it'sno
longer an issue.
But.. I cannibalized everything I could salvage and use on this HP Vista HP.
This includes several internal HD's a DVD drive [that hangs on the door,
removed] a Maxtor external 300 gig HD, a HP PSC 2355v AIO printer - scanner -
copier.
Both of the last 2 Maxtor and printer had software that no longer will even
install. Actually the Maxtor installs. and BSOD's every time it ran.
the printer and the Maxtor both work with 3rd party software.

So here's a thought, have you bothered to check the M$ Vista compatibility page
? It even has an applet to run and examine it to tell you if it's vista
compatible, and provide you a list of stuff that Vista will destroy.

There's also a stand alone you can download and run offline.
 
M

Mark Bourne

That wouldn't necessarily blow your hypothesis out of the water. Older
hardware may be compatible with Vista, even if it hasn't been tested.
I'd expect any disk drive or other storage device which fully complies
with the "USB Mass Storage" standard to work with Vista without
modification, since both Vista AND the device should be compliant with

FWIW: Vista exterminated both hardware & software when it came out. If I'd
wanted [and I didn't] to install Vista on my XP, It would have required buying
a new video card and throwing away a $400.00 one. Since the XP died, it's no
longer an issue.
But.. I cannibalized everything I could salvage and use on this HP Vista HP.
This includes several internal HD's a DVD drive [that hangs on the door,
removed] a Maxtor external 300 gig HD, a HP PSC 2355v AIO printer - scanner -
copier.
Both of the last 2 Maxtor and printer had software that no longer will even
install. Actually the Maxtor installs. and BSOD's every time it ran.
the printer and the Maxtor both work with 3rd party software.

I'm not saying all hardware will work with Vista, nor am I saying that
you wouldn't have needed to upgrade your video etc (although you might
not have actually needed to upgrade it if you didn't want the flashy new
Aero effects). Maybe the software which came with the drives doesn't
install (presumably some kind of backup or synchronisation software),
but the USB hard disks themselves *should* still work, with none of the
software installed, using the standard USB Mass Storage drivers provided
they comply with that standard, which most do. Printers I can understand
may not work because there are no standard drivers for them, and you
would need Vista compatible drivers, but as far as I could see all the
issues described here were with storage devices. Just because a printer
or other device isn't manufactured any more doesn't mean you won't be
able to get Vista drivers for it - I managed to get Vista drivers for my
printer and two NetMD recorders despite them being discontinued. Since
you've found that both work with 3rd party software, there is clearly
nothing wrong with the hardware devices and Vista, just the software
and, possibly, drivers which came with them.
So here's a thought, have you bothered to check the M$ Vista compatibility page
? It even has an applet to run and examine it to tell you if it's vista
compatible, and provide you a list of stuff that Vista will destroy.

I don't have a problem. I'm just trying to help those that do. I assume
the page you are referring to is the "Windows Vista hardware
compatibility list"? It doesn't seem to be available at the moment, but
I expect it would contain a list of devices which are KNOWN to work with
Vista, and possibly a list of devices which are KNOWN not to work. Any
device not on the list is not necessarily not going to work with Vista,
it's just that M$ haven't tested it for compatibility, and they won't
support it.
 
K

Kristian

I have this same problem!! Since I changed operation system to Vista allmost
every jpg files has been corrupted! Allmost 2000 photos and about 150 of
those are important because those are the originals I have sold! Doesn't
anyone really knows a solution to this problem. I have backups ofcourse but I
cant risk those by connecting that drive to this computer where Vista is. I
also noticed that some of my mp3 files corrupted also, first they were fine
but after I transferred those to internal harddrive they all corrupted!!!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top