B
Bryan Hughes
Hello,
I currently have a split access 2003 .mdb. The (BE) is on my network file
server, this will eventually be upgraded to a SQL server.
When the (FE) is opened several temp tables are created in a temp .mdb in
the local folder.
One temp table holds current user info (this info never changes while the
user is logged in).
Temp table two holds (Selected Case Manager id, Name), this changes when
user selects new case manger from tree menu.
Temp table three holds (CaseFile id, Case Name), this changes when the user
selects another case file from a tree menu.
Temp table four holds (Client ID, Client Name), this again changes when user
selects a client in the case file tree menu.
This data is used to retrieve data from the (BE), and perform other
functions depending on user selection.
This temp temp.mdb is deleted on close.
Is there a better way to do this then using temp tables?
Would a Property Get, and Let statement do the same thing better, or should
I use a hidden unbound form hold the info?
-TFTH
Bryan
I currently have a split access 2003 .mdb. The (BE) is on my network file
server, this will eventually be upgraded to a SQL server.
When the (FE) is opened several temp tables are created in a temp .mdb in
the local folder.
One temp table holds current user info (this info never changes while the
user is logged in).
Temp table two holds (Selected Case Manager id, Name), this changes when
user selects new case manger from tree menu.
Temp table three holds (CaseFile id, Case Name), this changes when the user
selects another case file from a tree menu.
Temp table four holds (Client ID, Client Name), this again changes when user
selects a client in the case file tree menu.
This data is used to retrieve data from the (BE), and perform other
functions depending on user selection.
This temp temp.mdb is deleted on close.
Is there a better way to do this then using temp tables?
Would a Property Get, and Let statement do the same thing better, or should
I use a hidden unbound form hold the info?
-TFTH
Bryan