M
Michael Stevens
In
Linda, as just about anyone knows I am not a fan or friend of Kurt, but your
post is so off base I must respond.
Kurt pushes buttons, and he really pushed yours to the point you sound like
you are close to a breakdown.
Not true, he posts more helpful posts than I have seen from you.
Not true, he posts with detailed examples of what formed his opinion.
True, he is tenacious and uses any means to do so.
The jury has not been given the chance to decide who is right or wrong yet,
so the only thing astonishing is you think he is astonishingly mistaken.
I see lots of documentation that forms his foundations, none are so far
proven, but they are well documented.
Possibly, but it is a general newsgroup and so therefore a pretty undefined
forum.
Pardon me, but I haven't noticed big difference in intellect.
I don't see glaring inaccuracies in Kurt's posts, but I do see a difference
of opinion in how Kurt see's the information and others in the newsgroups
interrupt it.
Partially true except for the I.Q's higher than 60
Certainly seems to have been a success in pushing your button.
Now I am getting worried about you.
Have you been able to prove you are right or he is wrong? Tell us about
copyright law. Whatever you say will have the same weight as Kurt, it has
not been defined.
I haven't noticed this at all. I even ask him for help on issues I know he
is an expert on.
Now here is where I can agree with you, I am not a fan of his tactics, but
your allegations are emotionally driven and exactly what Kurt was trying to
get from you.
The communication skills are crude and abrasive, but you have to agree, they
pushed your button and got HIS point across.
I think he is being honest with you, he is LOL
Yes you did, LOL Kind of makes that rational thought argument a little
shallow.
Not true
Not true, the name calling is a small part of the posts. You just let it
influence your judgement more than it should.
I haven't seen any fabrications, I don't agree with his opinions about what
he posts, but they are not fabrications.
LOL, most of the time I can see why.
I don't see all of them needing psychiatric evaluation, just a few. LOL
Now you went to his level.
I see little hard truth about Kurt from your post, but a lot of emotional
difference of opinion that clouds truth.
Profanity does not always have to be spoken to be profane.
--
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
(e-mail address removed)
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm
Linda B said:I will take this chance to state the obvious, and I believe that the
only reason you might relinquish the final word in this post -- if in
fact you do so -- is to try to save some face. Just for the record,
this is the second time you've "offered" me the final word (which is
completely illogical, but I don't expect you to understand that).
You have *taken* it on countless occasions. It is clearly your
foremost objective, and anyone who is wondering if that's true should
just run a query on your nick.
Linda, as just about anyone knows I am not a fan or friend of Kurt, but your
post is so off base I must respond.
Kurt pushes buttons, and he really pushed yours to the point you sound like
you are close to a breakdown.
Time and time again -- and this is shown by the written record here;
anyone can go and check - you have shown that your ultimate goal is
not to help people,
Not true, he posts more helpful posts than I have seen from you.
nor to participate in rational discussion,
Not true, he posts with detailed examples of what formed his opinion.
but to
espouse your own ideas and shoot down anyone you see as opposing you,
True, he is tenacious and uses any means to do so.
regardless of how correct they invariably are, and how astonishingly
mistaken you are.
The jury has not been given the chance to decide who is right or wrong yet,
so the only thing astonishing is you think he is astonishingly mistaken.
You fabricate foundations for these absurd
arguments seemingly out of thin air.
I see lots of documentation that forms his foundations, none are so far
proven, but they are well documented.
Such prestidigitation is not
well suited to a forum ostensibly devoted to the advancement of
knowledge; you serve only to bring the participants down to your
level. I am as guilty of this as any, and I take full responsibility
for my actions.
Possibly, but it is a general newsgroup and so therefore a pretty undefined
forum.
My only defense is that, being considerably more
intelligent than you,
Pardon me, but I haven't noticed big difference in intellect.
I feel some deep-seeded need to speak out
against the blatant, glaring inaccuracies you consistently introduce
into this forum. I have a great deal of trouble leaving stupidity
alone, especially your particular brand of it, which seems to
generate some depraved form of loyalty in those of similarly
deficient mind. I hate to see this inanity breed; you are a breeder
and nothing else.
I don't see glaring inaccuracies in Kurt's posts, but I do see a difference
of opinion in how Kurt see's the information and others in the newsgroups
interrupt it.
The tactics you employ to ensure the survival of this inanity are so
unrefined, so transparently obvious, that it pains me even to read
them. You don't listen to those with opposing viewpoints; you don't
pay attention to debate. You close your eyes, you close your mind,
and then you call people names. *You call them names!* The
absurdity of this is obviously lost on you - as it is lost on all
teenagers who call their schoolmates names - but to those of us with
I.Q's higher than 60,
Partially true except for the I.Q's higher than 60
Certainly seems to have been a success in pushing your button.
this is so patently ridiculous as to warrant
some concern on our part. You have all the intelligence of a sea
anemone, Kurt, and Darwinism suggests that someday soon, someone of
superior intellect (most anyone) is going to come along and remove
you from the food chain. We're concerned, my boy. We're concerned
for your well-being.
Now I am getting worried about you.
So: You call them names, you insult them, and when they respond to
your insults, you insult them some more for having stooped to your
level (a level on which, I might add, you have already very clearly
established yourself). You are a one-trick pony, Kurt. You don't
know what you're talking about when it comes to copyright law,
Have you been able to prove you are right or he is wrong? Tell us about
copyright law. Whatever you say will have the same weight as Kurt, it has
not been defined.
your
computer skills are clearly lacking,
I haven't noticed this at all. I even ask him for help on issues I know he
is an expert on.
and as for pure human
interaction, I've seen blind, rabid, lame dogs in heat with better
people skills.
Now here is where I can agree with you, I am not a fan of his tactics, but
your allegations are emotionally driven and exactly what Kurt was trying to
get from you.
I tell you this not because I think you're an
imbecile (though, clearly, you are), but because if you want to hold
out hope of ever getting your point across - about anything - you
should really start working on your communication skills.
The communication skills are crude and abrasive, but you have to agree, they
pushed your button and got HIS point across.
I
shouldn't even need to mention that the most ubiquitous proclamation
in all your quasi-arguments is "LOL," but it just goes to further my
point.
I think he is being honest with you, he is LOL
You can't formulate a rational thought to save your life, and
so you just go with the least common denominator, namely, a hackneyed
internet abbreviation, rampant verbal abuse, lame-duck opinions, and
microscopic genitalia. Whoops! Did I say that?
Yes you did, LOL Kind of makes that rational thought argument a little
shallow.
Let me summarize. You know nothing about any of the topics on which
you post;
Not true
your posts consist almost entirely of name-calling
Not true, the name calling is a small part of the posts. You just let it
influence your judgement more than it should.
and
fabricated, delusional arguments;
I haven't seen any fabrications, I don't agree with his opinions about what
he posts, but they are not fabrications.
you preface each one of those posts
with "LOL";
LOL, most of the time I can see why.
and all of your posts are so twisted, irrational, and
incoherent as to warrant psychiatric evaluation.
I don't see all of them needing psychiatric evaluation, just a few. LOL
What are you
*doing* here, Kurt? Shouldn't you be in a bayou somewhere, strumming
a banjo and waiting for your sister to get home? I think there's a
sow out back that needs your attention.
Now you went to his level.
I know this post will probably get edited out, and that's fine. I
only hope you get to it before Mike does, because it will be the last
time you'll hear from me - I'm finally going to filter you out of my
life. For a while I found your posts sort of entertaining in a sick,
masochistic way - I almost enjoyed discovering that your idiocy and
your depravity plumbed deeper depths than I previously imagined even
existed. Now, however, I've grown sick of your rants, your rambling,
and your rampant bestiality. Notice, though, that I've managed to
lay bare the cold, hard truth about you in this post without ever
having uttered a curse word. As they say, profanity is the result of
a deficient mind attempting to express itself forcefully, and your
mind is about as deficient as they come.
I see little hard truth about Kurt from your post, but a lot of emotional
difference of opinion that clouds truth.
Profanity does not always have to be spoken to be profane.
--
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
(e-mail address removed)
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm