[rant follows]
To be honest, I really don't care about HD DVD nor Blue Ray. I don't see
anything wrong with DVD - it plays movies well so long as the disc isn't
scratched or dirty. I'm not so psychologically mas*urbatory as to need to
be constantly dazzled by ever more fine images. DVD does A-OK. Maybe I'm
getting old, but it doesn't matter to me.
I like to go out to the theatres more than rent DVDs now [I rarely buy
them .. my collection is about 3 movies strong]. I've really slowed on the
rentals. I used to rent hundreds a year and was in the top ten for rentals
at the local Blockbuster. So all this fuss that I might actually copy one
is, to me, completely overblown, as I've nary even attempted to copy even
one.
I think the movie industry and Microsoft should relax a bit. Microsoft got
perfectly rich without WPA or Genuine Advantage etc. and the movie
companies only drive people away treating them like potential criminals.
No wonder overall sales are down.
If they spent more time on content quality and less worrying about whether
something might get copied they might make more sales. As it is, movies
are getting repetitious and sort of sad, having to depend on excess rather
new and interesting stories.
As an aside: As it is I've almost given up TV. I used to watch shows. Now
I just channel surf a bit, decide that there's nothing on in the 500
channel universe, and then go do something else. Movies too are getting
repetitous and boring, depending more on technical dazzling than content.
I used to be a SCI FI fan. I'd read all sorts of interesting SCI FI
stories with all sorts of interesting scenarios. With a rare exception all
SCI FI from Hollywood is "shoot 'em up". Yet they could have innumerable
scenarios if they wanted to. But all's they want is to shoot and kill. So
the fact that fewer people are going to movies is their own fault. Make
better movies, people will probably go.
Windows is going to get like that too. Microsoft is falling into the
"greedy trap" and trying to police its customers. Instead of offering
innovations they will try to make their money through enforcement. People
will lose interest (e.g. I cite the move from IE to Firefox and the rise
of Linux as a server) and growth will slow or even might, if Apple can
actually get the price down, reverse.
I'd prefer they didn't care so much about copy protection and more about
packing in some more and better games, themes and utilities. Then I could
feel proud recommending Microsoft Windows. But now it's:
"Microsoft has deliberately crippled Blueray in the 32-bit version of
Windows to pander to the interests of Time Warner, Lionsgate and 20th
Century Fox - Oh by the way, Windows continually checks up on you and
sends reports on you back to its corporate offices for possible police and
legal action against you. And if you so much as download a simple mp3 song
off a Russian website, by God you have violated the DMCA and can expect a
SWAT team attack, computer confiscation and lawsuit"
- not exactly anything to be proud of - too much
"commercialism/corporatism" and greed and not enough "computerism".
Rob Wilkens said:
Would you believe, if I want to play High Definition disks at home
WITHOUT my computer they're making me buy a New HDTV and a new kind of
(insert standard of choice here) DVD player. They refuse to support my
legacy hardware (why don't high definition disks work in my legacy V.C.R.
player). They claim my old 20" SDTV isn't capable of displaying the HDTV
content.
-Rob
(T.I.C.)
<DIV>"Little Brother"
<
[email protected]> wrote in