Spyware Blaster Update 10/10/05

[Randy Knobloch]

<http://msmvps.com/siljaline/archive/2005/10/04/68994.aspx>

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Security, AH-VSOP
_________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address
is invalid that we may all benefit.

 

[Guest]

Thanks, Randy!

 

[Randy Knobloch]

Thanks, Randy!

You're most welcome!
Ad-aware post on it's way.


--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Security, AH-VSOP
_________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address
is invalid that we may all benefit.

 

[plun]

Randy Knobloch presented the following explanation :

You're most welcome!
Ad-aware post on it's way.

Hi Randy

About Spywareblaster, have you seen any change notes about
Panda false/positives and Spywareblaster.

In my "home forum" we have users with problem that
Panda deactivates entrys for Spywareblaster.

Pandas support is a "dead end"..........

 

[Randy Knobloch]

:

Hi Randy

About Spywareblaster, have you seen any change notes about
Panda false/positives and Spywareblaster.

In my "home forum" we have users with problem that
Panda deactivates entrys for Spywareblaster.

Pandas support is a "dead end"..........

Hmmm.... never heard of Spyware Blaster conflicting with an A-V, that's odd.
Best bet is to ask the developers themselves.
*Register and ask here;
Official Javacool Software Forum:
<http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19>

Good luck and post back the URL, *here* where you asked your question(s)

Regards,
Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Security, AH-VSOP
_________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address
is invalid that we may all benefit.

 

[plun]

After serious thinking Randy Knobloch wrote :

:


Hmmm.... never heard of Spyware Blaster conflicting with an A-V, that's odd.
Best bet is to ask the developers themselves.
*Register and ask here;
Official Javacool Software Forum:
<http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19>

Good luck and post back the URL, *here* where you asked your question(s)

Regards,
Silj

Hi Randy

It´s already posted from other users.

And according to Bubba a moderator there have been problem
with Panda before with false/positives.

If this is a weakness within Spywareblaster or wrong removals
of registry keys with Panda no one knows.

But this update comes exactly with these problems and maybe it´s
solved.

Nothing important for me, just if you seen something, in this malware
jungle users going nuts over small problems and shouts "kill Panda"
and maybe this was a Spywareblaster weakness.

 

[Randy Knobloch]

:

Hi Randy

It´s already posted from other users.

And according to Bubba a moderator there have been problem
with Panda before with false/positives.

If this is a weakness within Spywareblaster or wrong removals
of registry keys with Panda no one knows.

But this update comes exactly with these problems and maybe it´s solved.

Nothing important for me, just if you seen something, in this malware jungle
users going nuts over small problems and shouts "kill Panda"
and maybe this was a Spywareblaster weakness.

Plun - noted, thanks - I shall spread the word.
We MVPs appreciate this sort of feedback, again, thanks.

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) & Security, AH-VSOP
_________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=31

Reply to group, as return address
is invalid that we may all benefit.