The client wishes to see the 2 sets so they can fix up there database. To
minimalize re-occurence.
That's what I don't understand.
You will now have three different tables containing the same data. Any or all
of the three tables can be edited. You now have many MORE opportunities to
screw up the data and have two or three different versions in three different
tables.
What benefit do you see coming from creating the redundant table... again?
Are you perhaps making the common but erroneous assumption that you need to
create a Table in order to create a Report?
Thats seems to do the trick with exact matches, is there a way to make it
not so exact on matches?
Probably. But my telepathy is a bit on the blink tonight and I don't know what
your data looks like or what constitutes a "not so exact" match.