Rethinking the Recycle Bin

Discussion in 'Windows Vista File Management' started by Yao Ziyuan, May 3, 2011.

  1. Yao Ziyuan

    Yao Ziyuan Guest

    I just have some new thoughts about the handling of file deletion and
    undeletion in the 2010s. The key points are:

    (1) ALMOST NEVER DELETE DATA PHYSICALLY. Today's new computers usually
    come with 500GB+ disk space, so deleting files to save space is less
    and less a necessity. So a new Recycle Bin concept could always
    preserve deleted files physically until there is really a space
    shortage or the user intends to permanently eliminate private
    information immediately.

    (2) FOCUS ON THE REASON, INSTEAD OF THE DATA. Sometimes we have a
    reason to delete a file or folder, but later we have a new reason to
    recover it, and later we may have a new reason to delete it again...
    We humans are not used to reviewing all possible reasons for deletion
    and undeletion all at once. So I think the role of the Recycle Bin
    should be a journal for the user to record his reasons, from time to
    time, for a file/folder's "deletion" and "undeletion". For example, a
    user may like a game, movie, song or other type of content at one time
    but wants to delete it at another time but later wants to recover it.
    It's really all about his reasons to hate or like the same content
    over time. It's really about the user's scoring and commenting about a
    file in the file system, rather than the file's physical necessity to
    exist or not. If the user gives a file a very low score and a comment
    about why it's so undesirable, the file can be hidden in the Recycle
    Bin. If the user later has a mood to recover it, the user will be
    shown his previous comments about this file and determine if he really
    have new, good reasons to undo his previous decision.
     
    Yao Ziyuan, May 3, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Yao Ziyuan

    Yao Ziyuan Guest

    On May 4, 5:16 am, Yao Ziyuan <> wrote:
    > I just have some new thoughts about the handling of file deletion and
    > undeletion in the 2010s. The key points are:
    >
    > (1) ALMOST NEVER DELETE DATA PHYSICALLY. Today's new computers usually
    > come with 500GB+ disk space, so deleting files to save space is less
    > and less a necessity. So a new Recycle Bin concept could always
    > preserve deleted files physically until there is really a space
    > shortage or the user intends to permanently eliminate private
    > information immediately.
    >
    > (2) FOCUS ON THE REASON, INSTEAD OF THE DATA. Sometimes we have a
    > reason to delete a file or folder, but later we have a new reason to
    > recover it, and later we may have a new reason to delete it again...
    > We humans are not used to reviewing all possible reasons for deletion
    > and undeletion all at once. So I think the role of the Recycle Bin
    > should be a journal for the user to record his reasons, from time to
    > time, for a file/folder's "deletion" and "undeletion". For example, a
    > user may like a game, movie, song or other type of content at one time
    > but wants to delete it at another time but later wants to recover it.
    > It's really all about his reasons to hate or like the same content
    > over time. It's really about the user's scoring and commenting about a
    > file in the file system, rather than the file's physical necessity to
    > exist or not. If the user gives a file a very low score and a comment
    > about why it's so undesirable, the file can be hidden in the Recycle
    > Bin. If the user later has a mood to recover it, the user will be
    > shown his previous comments about this file and determine if he really
    > have new, good reasons to undo his previous decision.


    And if the OS really has a disk space shortage, it can find out which
    files/folders have the lowest user scores (the same file can receive
    different user scores over time, so we can, say, find out the files/
    folders that receive the lowest average scores over the past 12 months
    or so) and suggest them to the user for physical deletion.
     
    Yao Ziyuan, May 3, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Yao Ziyuan

    Yao Ziyuan Guest

    On May 4, 5:16 am, Yao Ziyuan <> wrote:
    > I just have some new thoughts about the handling of file deletion and
    > undeletion in the 2010s. The key points are:
    >
    > (1) ALMOST NEVER DELETE DATA PHYSICALLY. Today's new computers usually
    > come with 500GB+ disk space, so deleting files to save space is less
    > and less a necessity. So a new Recycle Bin concept could always
    > preserve deleted files physically until there is really a space
    > shortage or the user intends to permanently eliminate private
    > information immediately.
    >
    > (2) FOCUS ON THE REASON, INSTEAD OF THE DATA. Sometimes we have a
    > reason to delete a file or folder, but later we have a new reason to
    > recover it, and later we may have a new reason to delete it again...
    > We humans are not used to reviewing all possible reasons for deletion
    > and undeletion all at once. So I think the role of the Recycle Bin
    > should be a journal for the user to record his reasons, from time to
    > time, for a file/folder's "deletion" and "undeletion". For example, a
    > user may like a game, movie, song or other type of content at one time
    > but wants to delete it at another time but later wants to recover it.
    > It's really all about his reasons to hate or like the same content
    > over time. It's really about the user's scoring and commenting about a
    > file in the file system, rather than the file's physical necessity to
    > exist or not. If the user gives a file a very low score and a comment
    > about why it's so undesirable, the file can be hidden in the Recycle
    > Bin. If the user later has a mood to recover it, the user will be
    > shown his previous comments about this file and determine if he really
    > have new, good reasons to undo his previous decision.


    Or think it this way: "For a recycle bin, there is always another
    recycle bin in it." We can have 99 levels in this "recycle bin stack".
    If you want to "really" delete a file in a recycle bin, it always goes
    down to the next level recycle bin. If you want to retrieve a file,
    you need to go down to the level of recycle bin it resides in.
     
    Yao Ziyuan, May 4, 2011
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Guest

    accidently deleted recycle bin

    Guest, Jun 11, 2006, in forum: Windows Vista File Management
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    435
    Zack Whittaker
    Jun 12, 2006
  2. Guest

    Recycle Bin Will Not Empty

    Guest, Jun 15, 2006, in forum: Windows Vista File Management
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    450
    Guest
    Jun 16, 2006
  3. Guest

    Recovering recycle bin

    Guest, Feb 16, 2007, in forum: Windows Vista File Management
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    409
    Ramesh, MS-MVP
    Feb 16, 2007
  4. Guest

    Where does the Recycle Bin live?

    Guest, Feb 24, 2007, in forum: Windows Vista File Management
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    549
    Guest
    Feb 25, 2007
  5. Ben Enfield

    Recycle Bin on External Drives

    Ben Enfield, Feb 26, 2007, in forum: Windows Vista File Management
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    412
    GBorn
    Feb 27, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page