Removal of spyware

M

Mo

In all the time i have this Beta Spyware installed it has
not shown one infection but if i download a free version
of webroot spysweeper it cleans anything up to a dozen
spyware ads. Why is this?
 
R

Ron Chamberlin

Hi Mo,
In the Beta1 version, the program doesn't go into the cookie jar, nor does
it chase data miner objects.

Ron Chamberlin
MS-MVP
 
A

Andre Da Costa

This has been discussed many times, the approach each AntiSpyware product
uses is different from each other. Some track for cookies, some don't. In
the case of MSAS, it does not track for cookies, here is Steve Dodson's say
on cookie tracking:

As a user of many anti-spyware applications over the years, one item has
always bothered me when removed by antispyware applications. That item is
"tracking" cookies. Many people in the industry know what cookies are, and
how they can be used, but I do not think my parents would know anything
about cookies. In my opinion, the industry has created a scare tactic in
order to make a "problem" seem worse than it really is. I see this a lot
when people are reporting that one program is better than another in respect
to cookies. I really do not see how someone can make that argument. I can
write a program which deletes n+1 files if I want until I reach a point
where there are no more files to delete.
So why is this a problem?? Users do not know what files are good or bad, and
therefore rely on the application to determine this for them. But if I am
the programmer for another application, I could delete all good and bad
files and then say... " We delete more files than Product X." The end user
then says... "Of course..I want the other product...more is better!!" These
users will then end up losing some settings which were never malicious in
the first place. This leads me to the last thought...
Cookies by themselves are not malicious; they are text files with settings.
Cookies can be a part of some application which calls on the text file in
order to send information to a 3rd party, but end the end, they are only
text files. In order for "tracking" cookies to be of use, a corresponding
application needs to be running in the background and grab information off
this file. I think this is where anti-spyware applications need to be
focusing their efforts - removal of the application which uses these text
files instead of blowing away all good and bad cookies.
I think the cookie argument will go on for a while, but as long as the end
user cannot discern what is good versus what is bad, the industry needs to
work on improving the logic of removing applications as opposed to deleting
all cookies.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
 
P

plun

I think the cookie argument will go on for a while, but as long as the end
user cannot discern what is good versus what is bad, the industry needs to
work on improving the logic of removing applications as opposed to deleting
all cookies.

"Bulls eye"........ as with a lot of MS functionality that the bad
guys uses.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Webroot Spysweeper installation error 1
No Cookie Removal? 3
Spyware infection 1
With cnsMin hijacker nothing works 1
Rivarts.A Alert 14
Mediatickets CDT (Spyware) 1
Spyware 3
News WhatsApp vulnerability revealed 6

Top