B
Ben
I understand your point, however, there might be occasions when such 1:1
relationships occur for privacy reasons (splitting "private" information into
a separate table) and providing a link to the "public" table. In any event,
whether 1:1 or 1:M, my key frustration seems to be that I do not see ALL of
the same "EmpID" values in both "tblEmployees" and "tblEmployeeInfo" (whether
or not fields other than "EmpID" have any values entered -- in the
"tblEmployeeInfo").
Maybe it's this idea I have that there should at least be a "placeholder" in
evidence in the subordinate table to ensure that one can visually verify the
match between EmpID values in the tblEmployees and EmpID values in the
tblEmpInformation.
As to your comment about the main form and subform, I get exactly what I
expect when I navigate through the records in the main form (I see ALL EmpID
values in both tables, even if additional field values have not been entered
into the subform or subordinate table).
So, I am still left with my issue, but I do thank you for the resource link.
relationships occur for privacy reasons (splitting "private" information into
a separate table) and providing a link to the "public" table. In any event,
whether 1:1 or 1:M, my key frustration seems to be that I do not see ALL of
the same "EmpID" values in both "tblEmployees" and "tblEmployeeInfo" (whether
or not fields other than "EmpID" have any values entered -- in the
"tblEmployeeInfo").
Maybe it's this idea I have that there should at least be a "placeholder" in
evidence in the subordinate table to ensure that one can visually verify the
match between EmpID values in the tblEmployees and EmpID values in the
tblEmpInformation.
As to your comment about the main form and subform, I get exactly what I
expect when I navigate through the records in the main form (I see ALL EmpID
values in both tables, even if additional field values have not been entered
into the subform or subordinate table).
So, I am still left with my issue, but I do thank you for the resource link.