R
raylopez99
Is there a better way (faster, cleaner) of checking for a null than
the below? I tried various other ways (commented out) and they give
run-time errors.
treeView1.Node[999] does not exist, it's a null.
TX
RL
try
{
if (treeView1.Nodes[999] == null)
throw new ArgumentException("Node cannot be
null!");
}
//if ((this.treeView1.Nodes[999] == null)) //doesn't work,
compiles but run time error
//{
// TreeNode bogusTreeNode = treeView1.Nodes[999];
// MessageBox.Show("bogus node!!");
//}
//next line will will trigger exception "out of bounds",
run-time
//if (!(bogusTreeNode.Parent != null))
{ MessageBox.Show("bogus node!"); }
catch (ArgumentException ex)
{
// MessageBox.Show("exception! bogus node"); //works
}
the below? I tried various other ways (commented out) and they give
run-time errors.
treeView1.Node[999] does not exist, it's a null.
TX
RL
try
{
if (treeView1.Nodes[999] == null)
throw new ArgumentException("Node cannot be
null!");
}
//if ((this.treeView1.Nodes[999] == null)) //doesn't work,
compiles but run time error
//{
// TreeNode bogusTreeNode = treeView1.Nodes[999];
// MessageBox.Show("bogus node!!");
//}
//next line will will trigger exception "out of bounds",
run-time
//if (!(bogusTreeNode.Parent != null))
{ MessageBox.Show("bogus node!"); }
catch (ArgumentException ex)
{
// MessageBox.Show("exception! bogus node"); //works
}