Pulse Audio, Yet Another Linux Engineering Failure.

D

Doctor Smith

http://linsux.org/index.php?topic=948.0

http://www.linsux.org/uploads/linsuxformat-issue1.pdf

Linux has been notorious for supporting more than one sound system. ALSA
(Advanced Linux Sound System) and OSS (Open Sound System) . Other systems
build upon it, such as PortAudio and JACK. In an attempt to unify them,
Linux devs forever ****ed up a setup that only needed a bit of extra
configuration to properly work.


" PulseAudio was the retarded inbred child that came out of the wreckage.
With only support for unifying OSS and ALSA, many multimedia applications
get left out in the cold. Take Audacity, for example. The popular recording
app is usually measured against prosumer applications such as Goldwave.
Audacity itself is based upon the WxWidget toolset, and the multimedia
framework it uses is PortAudio. Currently, no complete backend for
PortAudio exists."


" Users have to disable PulseAudio and experience the joys of choppy audio
playback. Did the recording **** up, or is it the playback?"


" Who knows, the fact remains that editing in that app suddenly becomes a
major pain to use. Are you on the professional grade of recording, and not
give a shit about ¡§average¡¨ apps like Audacity? Well, shit, Ardour and JACK
are pretty well-respected, right?"


"Obviously, it isn¡¦t respected enough to get proper bugfixes from the
PulseAudio devs. The JACK framework becomes horribly incompatible with
PulseAudio and, say, an OSS driver for a Logitech microphone."

" It becomes even worse on mics that were deemed by Microsoft and Apple to
¡§Just Work¡¨. Even if you get Ardour to record, you won¡¦t be able to edit
for very long. "


"Indeed, multimedia apps on Linux seem to collapse under their own weight.
Ardour crashes within the span of five minutes. Renowned video apps such as
KDEnlive, LiVES, or Cinelerra all segfault from PulseAudio-based problems.
"


"What do the devs do about it? NOTHING. Look at their mailing lists and
forum discussions. Between their pompous cries of ¡§READ THE FAQ¡¨ and ¡§CHECK
THE WIKI¡¨, newcomers to PulseAudio struggle to understand the overly
complex and bloated sound system."



" What¡¦s worse, some apps choose to ONLY choose one framework or another.
On Gnome, this is less of an issue. On KDE, XFCE, Blackbox, E17, GNUStep,
and other desktop environments, it¡¦s KIND OF A BIG ****ING DEAL. Not being
able to listen to songs =FAIL Not being able to listen to your own
recordings = DOUBLE FAIL. And don¡¦t get me started on games. If OpenArena
plays sound, and Tremulous doesn¡¦t, and PulseAudio is set as your main
audio framework, and you configured everything¡Kwell¡K You¡¦re on your own."


And that ladies and gentlemen is a perfect example of why Linux sucks.
And it does.
 
B

Bill Yanaire

<SNIP SHIT>

Yes, you must be roy's bitch. You bend over for him constantly. What a
loser.
 
H

Hadron

Doctor Smith said:
http://linsux.org/index.php?topic=948.0

http://www.linsux.org/uploads/linsuxformat-issue1.pdf

Linux has been notorious for supporting more than one sound system. ALSA
(Advanced Linux Sound System) and OSS (Open Sound System) . Other systems
build upon it, such as PortAudio and JACK. In an attempt to unify them,
Linux devs forever ****ed up a setup that only needed a bit of extra
configuration to properly work.


" PulseAudio was the retarded inbred child that came out of the wreckage.
With only support for unifying OSS and ALSA, many multimedia applications
get left out in the cold. Take Audacity, for example. The popular recording
app is usually measured against prosumer applications such as Goldwave.
Audacity itself is based upon the WxWidget toolset, and the multimedia
framework it uses is PortAudio. Currently, no complete backend for
PortAudio exists."


" Users have to disable PulseAudio and experience the joys of choppy audio
playback. Did the recording **** up, or is it the playback?"


" Who knows, the fact remains that editing in that app suddenly becomes a
major pain to use. Are you on the professional grade of recording, and not
give a shit about “average†apps like Audacity? Well, shit, Ardour and JACK
are pretty well-respected, right?"


"Obviously, it isn’t respected enough to get proper bugfixes from the
PulseAudio devs. The JACK framework becomes horribly incompatible with
PulseAudio and, say, an OSS driver for a Logitech microphone."

" It becomes even worse on mics that were deemed by Microsoft and Apple to
“Just Workâ€. Even if you get Ardour to record, you won’t be able to edit
for very long. "


"Indeed, multimedia apps on Linux seem to collapse under their own weight.
Ardour crashes within the span of five minutes. Renowned video apps such as
KDEnlive, LiVES, or Cinelerra all segfault from PulseAudio-based problems.
"


"What do the devs do about it? NOTHING. Look at their mailing lists and
forum discussions. Between their pompous cries of “READ THE FAQ†and “CHECK
THE WIKIâ€, newcomers to PulseAudio struggle to understand the overly
complex and bloated sound system."



" What’s worse, some apps choose to ONLY choose one framework or another.
On Gnome, this is less of an issue. On KDE, XFCE, Blackbox, E17, GNUStep,
and other desktop environments, it’s KIND OF A BIG ****ING DEAL. Not being
able to listen to songs =FAIL Not being able to listen to your own
recordings = DOUBLE FAIL. And don’t get me started on games. If OpenArena
plays sound, and Tremulous doesn’t, and PulseAudio is set as your main
audio framework, and you configured everything…well… You’re on your own."


And that ladies and gentlemen is a perfect example of why Linux sucks.
And it does.

Linux audio is a complete and utter mess. And "choice" has made is
so. How? Rather than concentrate on fixing the tricky bits in existing
mountains of amateur code, newboyz decide to create a new one. And as
soon as they hit the tricky bits .... yes, it starts all over again.

Even TRYING to FIGURE OUT what the different "things" in a Linux audio
setup can do is difficult. never mind fixing them or reconfiguring
them.
 
C

Chris Ahlstrom

After takin' a swig o' grog, Doctor Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:

<Garbage snipped>

Looks like the flatfish is bothering the Linux and Windows groups with his
inane garbage again.
 
B

Bill Yanaire

Chris Ahlstrom said:
After takin' a swig o' grog, Doctor Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:

<Garbage snipped>

Looks like the flatfish is bothering the Linux and Windows groups with his
inane garbage again.
Maybe old Doctor Smith was rejected by the Sheep again and is pissed off
 
D

Doctor Smith

<SNIP SHIT>

Yes, you must be roy's bitch. You bend over for him constantly. What a
loser.

You are mixing me up with Chrish Ahlstrom = Liarmutt = Linosuck = Linonut.
Chris's head is so far up Schestowitz's ass, if you tickle Chris's feet,
Roy Schestowitz laughs.
 
E

Ezekiel

Doctor Smith said:
http://linsux.org/index.php?topic=948.0

http://www.linsux.org/uploads/linsuxformat-issue1.pdf

Linux has been notorious for supporting more than one sound system. ALSA
(Advanced Linux Sound System) and OSS (Open Sound System) . Other systems
build upon it, such as PortAudio and JACK. In an attempt to unify them,
Linux devs forever ****ed up a setup that only needed a bit of extra
configuration to properly work.


" PulseAudio was the retarded inbred child that came out of the wreckage.
With only support for unifying OSS and ALSA, many multimedia applications
get left out in the cold. Take Audacity, for example. The popular
recording
app is usually measured against prosumer applications such as Goldwave.
Audacity itself is based upon the WxWidget toolset, and the multimedia
framework it uses is PortAudio. Currently, no complete backend for
PortAudio exists."


" Users have to disable PulseAudio and experience the joys of choppy audio
playback. Did the recording **** up, or is it the playback?"


" Who knows, the fact remains that editing in that app suddenly becomes a
major pain to use. Are you on the professional grade of recording, and not
give a shit about ¡§average¡¨ apps like Audacity? Well, shit, Ardour and
JACK
are pretty well-respected, right?"


"Obviously, it isn¡¦t respected enough to get proper bugfixes from the
PulseAudio devs. The JACK framework becomes horribly incompatible with
PulseAudio and, say, an OSS driver for a Logitech microphone."

" It becomes even worse on mics that were deemed by Microsoft and Apple to
¡§Just Work¡¨. Even if you get Ardour to record, you won¡¦t be able to
edit
for very long. "


"Indeed, multimedia apps on Linux seem to collapse under their own weight.
Ardour crashes within the span of five minutes. Renowned video apps such
as
KDEnlive, LiVES, or Cinelerra all segfault from PulseAudio-based problems.
"


"What do the devs do about it? NOTHING. Look at their mailing lists and
forum discussions. Between their pompous cries of ¡§READ THE FAQ¡¨ and
¡§CHECK
THE WIKI¡¨, newcomers to PulseAudio struggle to understand the overly
complex and bloated sound system."



" What¡¦s worse, some apps choose to ONLY choose one framework or another.
On Gnome, this is less of an issue. On KDE, XFCE, Blackbox, E17, GNUStep,
and other desktop environments, it¡¦s KIND OF A BIG ****ING DEAL. Not
being
able to listen to songs =FAIL Not being able to listen to your own
recordings = DOUBLE FAIL. And don¡¦t get me started on games. If OpenArena
plays sound, and Tremulous doesn¡¦t, and PulseAudio is set as your main
audio framework, and you configured everything¡Kwell¡K You¡¦re on your
own."


And that ladies and gentlemen is a perfect example of why Linux sucks.
And it does.

This explains why about 60% of the time that I start Linux there's no sound
and I need to manually start and stop alsa in order to get sound working.
 
D

dawhead

On Apr 21, 12:57 pm, Doctor Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:

[ blah blah blah blah ]

the list of what you don't seem to know or understand seems long. we
could start with:

* the differing goals of systems like ALSA (hardware abstraction)
and PulseAudio
(network audio, device switching, global per-application
control, and more)
* just as you wouldn't run a significant webserver on a generic
install, you don't
do prosumer let along pro music recording/playback on a
generic install
* the presence of several different sound systems on Windows that
are capable
of causing similar issues for users there (MME, WDM, ASIO and
more)
* the fact that no application is expected to ever "support
PulseAudio"

i could go on, but what's the point. its COLA.
 
D

dawhead

Apple doesn't need separate sound systems for consumer, prosumer, and
pro.  Why does Linux?

Why not ask Microsoft? After all, they do everything so well, I guess
we decided to copy them.

Or did you actually want a serious reply to that? on COLA?
 
D

Doctor Smith

Apple doesn't need separate sound systems for consumer, prosumer, and
pro. Why does Linux?

Neither does Windows, really.

Click ASIO or WDM in the application.
That's it.
Most people find ASIO allows for lower latencies.

Linux is a total mess when it comes to sound.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top