J
Jeff Malka
I am running XP Home on a laptop and had an interesting experience:
I defragmented my drive using PerfectDisk 6.0 "SmartPlacement" mode. Then I
ran BootVis and optimized the bootup.
On a hunch, I analyzed the drive again, using Perfect Disk, and noticed that
the file arrangement was no longer as regular and defragmented as it had
been prior to using BootVis. This made me wonder if these two utilities do
not negate each other: PerfectDisk's "SmartPlacement" places the files along
a certain logic which BootVis changes to suit itself and vice-versa. They
apparently do not seem to agree on some file placements and I do not know
which is preferable or how to use them.
Any thoughts?
I defragmented my drive using PerfectDisk 6.0 "SmartPlacement" mode. Then I
ran BootVis and optimized the bootup.
On a hunch, I analyzed the drive again, using Perfect Disk, and noticed that
the file arrangement was no longer as regular and defragmented as it had
been prior to using BootVis. This made me wonder if these two utilities do
not negate each other: PerfectDisk's "SmartPlacement" places the files along
a certain logic which BootVis changes to suit itself and vice-versa. They
apparently do not seem to agree on some file placements and I do not know
which is preferable or how to use them.
Any thoughts?