J
jonah
What I meant is that one cannot know the internal improvements by
merely looking at or even trying out the system. These things may have
intenal functionality enhancements that, as great as they may be, are
not obvious to the user. For example, fewer blue screens, reduced
exposure to viruses, or faster performance by some services are not
things that one can "see" immediately.
Sure OK I see what you are saying, I can confidently say that most of
the small business owners I deal with are either pretty computer
literate themselves or employ somebody who is so they know its more
than a pretty interface, they have read the press coverage, they know
whats going on, they are not numpties.
I wish to be clear this is not about having a go at M$, this is about
the general feeldback I am getting now compared with XP in its early
days and my points are entirely from my own personal experience I am
not making sweeping generalisations intentionally.
My main concern is that when XP was 9 to 12 months off release these
same people wanted it ASAP, they were eager for it, they were asking
about upgrading hardware in anticipation so they were XP ready
especially the guys stuck with Win98. There was a feeling that it was
the right time to ugrade in general. It was not all good by any means
but generally small businesses were interested.
At the moment (I speak only for my little corner of the globe) the
prospect of Vista in 12 months is greeted with total apathy by the
very same people who slavered at the prospect of XP, this may change I
hope so cos its my living like many others and a new OS should be
bonanza time.
I think even in 12 months its too early for a new OS here at least, I
hope I am wrong.
Jonah